I need more popcorn
I need more popcorn
Darren
Gear : Nikon Goodness
Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
Please support Precious Hearts
Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated
At great personal risk, might I suggest the Sigma 8-16mm?
It's a very recent release with at least one good review online so far:
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/515-sigma816f4556apsc
Canon EOS 40D + 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS + 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS + 50mm f1.8 II // Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1 // Canon T90 + 50mm f1.8 FD + 300TL
Sigma 600mm f8 mirror FD + Tamron-Popular 500mm f8 preset + Vivitar 300mm f5.6 M42
Photoshop CS5 Extended on Windows XP
My Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nickant44/
^ It's a little bit short on the long end .... but .. ohh .. the possibilities of that wide, wide, w i d e wide end ...... Probably cheaper than the 10-22 as well. Why not?
Last edited by Kym; 27-06-2010 at 12:14am.
Hi Im Darren
www.darrengrayphotography.com
SONY A850 (FF)] + GRIP | SONY A350 (APS-C) + GRIP | SONY NEX-5 +16 2.8 + 18-55 E-MOUNT LENSES | CZ 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-75 2.8 | 70-200 2.8 | 2 x 42AMs | 24" imac | LR | CS4 | + loads of other junk
I've been out with Nel at an Aid for Africa fund-raiser dinner dance. All nice.
Now I get home... and I just did a bunch of heavy edits of this thread, I really wish I did not have to!
Stick to the facts in a polite way.
_____________
Ok, focal length is just that. The crop factor does not multiply the FL, it only appears that way.
Silly camera marketing seems to say it does.
Dave's post here illustrates it... http://www.ausphotography.net.au/for...ad.php?t=36999
Thats the very least that we can all do.
_____________
And thats probably what I should have said in the first place, and included the word equivalent somewhere in place of effective. My bad. Apart from alluding to the fact that a 20mm lens on a FF body will appear similar to a 10mm lens on a crop body (quite obviously incorrect, and a mistake on my part ) I dont see what I said to receive the barrage I received.
On a 50D, yes 10-22 is an UWA lens. On a 5D/1D camera a 16-35 is a WA lens. If you want super wide on a 5D, Tony is quite obviously correct, the Sigma 12-24 is the only available option. (as far as I know anyway ?? and Im about to buy one for my FF A850)
So again .. I apologise flash if I confused you with my initial post.
So summising, I guess if you want UWA .. as Tony says, the Canon 10-22 is the one you want for your 50D. Another one to maybe consider is the Sigma 10-20. Great lens with a really good reputation .. I loved mine until I upgraded to FF.
Peace
Last edited by bigdazzler; 27-06-2010 at 8:01am.