User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: lens comparison

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I need more popcorn
    Darren
    Gear : Nikon Goodness
    Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
    Please support Precious Hearts
    Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated

  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    13 Feb 2010
    Location
    Clarendon
    Posts
    72
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At great personal risk, might I suggest the Sigma 8-16mm?
    It's a very recent release with at least one good review online so far:
    http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/515-sigma816f4556apsc
    Canon EOS 40D + 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS + 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS + 50mm f1.8 II // Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1 // Canon T90 + 50mm f1.8 FD + 300TL
    Sigma 600mm f8 mirror FD + Tamron-Popular 500mm f8 preset + Vivitar 300mm f5.6 M42
    Photoshop CS5 Extended on Windows XP
    My Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nickant44/

  3. #23
    can't remember Tannin's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Huon Valley
    Posts
    4,126
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^ It's a little bit short on the long end .... but .. ohh .. the possibilities of that wide, wide, w i d e wide end ...... Probably cheaper than the 10-22 as well. Why not?

  4. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    13 Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,048
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by flash View Post
    sorry folks, I'll think very hard before I ask another question!
    I apologise that your thread went off the rails mate ... as for Tonys advice, listen to him cause he does know what hes talking about.

    Mod note: redacted personal comments. I apologise if I confused you in any way.
    Last edited by Kym; 27-06-2010 at 12:14am.
    Hi Im Darren

    www.darrengrayphotography.com

    SONY A850 (FF)] + GRIP | SONY A350 (APS-C) + GRIP | SONY NEX-5 +16 2.8 + 18-55 E-MOUNT LENSES | CZ 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-75 2.8 | 70-200 2.8 | 2 x 42AMs | 24" imac | LR | CS4 | + loads of other junk


  5. #25
    It's all about the Light!
    Tech Admin
    Kym's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury, Adelaide
    Posts
    9,632
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been out with Nel at an Aid for Africa fund-raiser dinner dance. All nice.
    Now I get home... and I just did a bunch of heavy edits of this thread, I really wish I did not have to!
    Stick to the facts in a polite way.

    _____________

    Ok, focal length is just that. The crop factor does not multiply the FL, it only appears that way.
    Silly camera marketing seems to say it does.
    Dave's post here illustrates it... http://www.ausphotography.net.au/for...ad.php?t=36999

  6. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    13 Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,048
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kym View Post
    Stick to the facts in a polite way.
    Thats the very least that we can all do.

    _____________

    Quote Originally Posted by Kym View Post
    Ok, focal length is just that. The crop factor does not multiply the FL, it only appears that way.
    And thats probably what I should have said in the first place, and included the word equivalent somewhere in place of effective. My bad. Apart from alluding to the fact that a 20mm lens on a FF body will appear similar to a 10mm lens on a crop body (quite obviously incorrect, and a mistake on my part ) I dont see what I said to receive the barrage I received.

    On a 50D, yes 10-22 is an UWA lens. On a 5D/1D camera a 16-35 is a WA lens. If you want super wide on a 5D, Tony is quite obviously correct, the Sigma 12-24 is the only available option. (as far as I know anyway ?? and Im about to buy one for my FF A850)

    So again .. I apologise flash if I confused you with my initial post.

    So summising, I guess if you want UWA .. as Tony says, the Canon 10-22 is the one you want for your 50D. Another one to maybe consider is the Sigma 10-20. Great lens with a really good reputation .. I loved mine until I upgraded to FF.

    Peace
    Last edited by bigdazzler; 27-06-2010 at 8:01am.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •