(not so) Professional Photographers and Editing

[Tannin]

http://smilepanic.com/photoshop-disasters

See it and weep.

[I @ M]

All done with the intention of creative genius and then excused as artistic license.
How sad.

[Longshots]

yep there are some classics there.

But wonder if someone could tell me whats wrong with number 7 ?

Personally I see nothing wrong with the position of the foot (am I missing something); it just looks to me like a position a dancer trained model, ("turning her feet out in "fourth" position") would potentially stand in.

[Dizzy Photographics]

yep there are some classics there.

But wonder if someone could tell me whats wrong with number 7 ?

Personally I see nothing wrong with the position of the foot (am I missing something); it just looks to me like a position a dancer trained model, ("turning her feet out in "fourth" position") would potentially stand in.

there would be no shadow for the masive cheque he is holding nor the reflection in the car

Rather interesting...find it hard to believe that these actually got past the people that surely would have to proof these before being published

[Longshots]

Hey Deb


If you're going to quote me, then perhaps you could read what I actually asked about, which was the number 7 example ?

And I also referred to the manner in which the female talent was standing

Here's the link:
http://smilepanic.com/photoshop-disa...shop_mistakes7

[Raven]

lol some doozies there!

yep there are some classics there.

But wonder if someone could tell me whats wrong with number 7 ?

Personally I see nothing wrong with the position of the foot (am I missing something); it just looks to me like a position a dancer trained model, ("turning her feet out in "fourth" position") would potentially stand in.

I think for No7 it's the leg and how the skin seems to have been stretched toward the other leg. There is no gap and I think perhaps there should be.

With that bent leg one, it does look a bit awkward but I agree it's not impossible, especially if one is flexible!

The one I don't get is the Eminem one. I'm missing the problem there unless it's the excessive frown on the forehead

[Tannin]

I don't get the Victoria's secret one

[Keith]

I don't get the Victoria's secret one

Not sure either .. the curve all down the left of her body looks too smooth tho.

[Xenedis]

Hilarious, but what's wrong with the first image in which Eminem's face is circled?

[Tannin]

^ I can't figure that one either. Well, he's an ugly coot, but we can't blame Photoshop for that.

[Xenedis]

^ I can't figure that one either. Well, he's an ugly coot, but we can't blame Photoshop for that.

Yeah, Photoshop cannot work miracles.

I presume that the torso is not Eminem's, but I'm not familiar with the topless appearances of these (c)rap guys.

Word up, yo.

[ving]

ROFL!
good stuff!