User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: 5D vs 5D Mark II

  1. #41
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Join Date
    08 Nov 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,303
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mercho View Post
    I have fone a bit of reading on the 135mm and it looks like a great prime! Fairly well priced too..
    The 135/2L is a stellar lens. I've had mine since 2006.

    It is one of the most inexpensive L lenses you can get, but its performance and IQ is first-rate. Ridiculously sharp, extremely fast to focus, and delivers very creamy bokeh. IMO and IME, it's a must-have.

    Quote Originally Posted by mercho View Post
    Xenedis, thanks for the info! I skimmed over the review and it has a very in depth comparison! Looks good! I have pretty much made my mind up to put in the extra $ and go the MKII, hopefully that price drop comes soon
    I just got mine two weeks ago, and paid marginally over $3K from a large B&M. There had better not be a price decrease. :-)

  2. #42
    Member
    Join Date
    05 Jan 2007
    Location
    Northern Beaches, Sydney
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For what its worth:

    Another point to consider is if you need 21MP (Mark II) as opposed to the 13MP (Mark I) ?

    I have the 5D (Mark I) and find that 13MP is fine. I have an iso800 image I have printed up to A3 size and can't notice any noise/pixelation. Do you need photos printed larger than A3 size ?
    Canon 5D | BG-E4 battery grip | 17-40mm f/4L zoom | 50mm f/1.4 prime | 24-70mm f/2.8L zoom | 300mm f/4L IS prime | 1.4x III teleconverter| 580EX II flash | Velbon Sherpa 600n tripod | Lowepro Nova 3AW bag | Various Singh-Ray Filters

    Wish List | 100mm f/2.8 macro

  3. #43
    New Member
    Join Date
    20 Jun 2006
    Location
    **Suburb/Town Required**
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I got a mark I in august last year, impulse buy from 2nd hand section of the local camera store and loved it that much went out and bought another.

    at this point in time I really couldn't justify the addition spend. I have been able to blow up to A3 with no noticeable grain (ISO 400). With the low light shots there is no comparison between the 30d that it was replacing.
    Word of the day
    Flickr
    http://nob.au.com
    Canon 5d, Canon 20d, Canon 30d, and a whole lotta Canon glass
    For Geeky Tshirts check out
    http://www.gtee.com.au

  4. #44
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    08 Nov 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by finn View Post
    For what its worth:

    Another point to consider is if you need 21MP (Mark II) as opposed to the 13MP (Mark I) ?
    One of the points re the 21MP is the ability to crop and still have a reasonable image. I think Sheila made this point above but here is a real world example
    from last week:
    whole frame -


    crop from whole frame -

    Alan
    -------------------------------------------
    Olympus OM-1, EM-1, Canon 5DMkII, and a few other bits and bobs



  5. #45
    Member Annalah's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Jun 2009
    Location
    **Suburb/Town Required**
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I too have been thinking of buying 5d mark II! Sounds like a great Idea!
    I am sure gonna see the difference between my outdated 6MP Pentax & mark II's 21.1MPs.

    Thanks everyone for the advice.
    Annalah

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •