User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 47 of 47

Thread: which L lens should be the first to buy?

  1. #41
    Member
    Join Date
    29 Jun 2006
    Location
    North Shore
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ill start by saying that I hate when a thread starts by specifying the brand/level of lens wanted yet the use isnt the main feature of the purchase. I have used both the lenses you want, and the 17-40, and 24-70 on crop and full frame. I dislike all of them on crop. They are either way to long or have too short a range. If i was buying for crop there is no way I wouldnt buy the 17-55/2.8 IS. Good focal length rated by lots of people to be better than the two other Ls. Plus 2.8 and IS.
    Using a 7d or a s95
    Advice and Edits welcome
    http://adamrose.wordpress.com/ [/CENTER]

  2. #42
    Member
    Join Date
    31 Dec 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    486
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i own both the 17-40 and the 24-104 for a fair while... both good lenses.
    I think I see more amazing photos coming from the 16-35 than these though.
    I wold get one but i already to too many WA's
    Canon 5D MKII, 17-40mm f/4L, 24-105mm f/4L, 17mm TS-E f/4L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L
    135mm f/2L.
    Alien bee lights, Gitzo tripods, Adobe CS5

    I find the single most valuable tool on my computer is my recycle bin.


  3. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    31 Dec 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    486
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    double post

  4. #44
    Member The_Camera_Poser's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 May 2008
    Location
    Sheffield TAS
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Canon 17-40L from the US, and a Canon 70-200/4L, and get a monopod if you need one.

    Why compromise? :-)
    www.awayfromitall.zenfolio.com

    "...in Wildness is the preservation of the world...in short, all good things are wild and free..." Henry David Thoreau

  5. #45
    Member
    Join Date
    29 Dec 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    87
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I highly recommend the 24-105mm. I have it on my 40D and took it to Europe. It was brilliant next to 10-22mm. The 24-105mm is crazy sharp even at F4. The 24-105mm is definitely not wasted on a crop body.

    24-105mm Macro Style - Click if you want it bigger.....

  6. #46
    Member sonofcoco's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Sep 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My first (and currently only) L lens was the 70-200mm f4L. It's a beautiful lens, but I think first you should work out exactly what you want it for and then come up with a list of lenses that would suit the purpose. I was planning to get a 17-40mm f4L lens a couple of months back, but ended up going for the 10-22mm at the last moment after doing some reading online. Decided the UWA was a better option than the 17-40 as I won't be upgrading to full-frame for some time...unless I win the lotto.

    The 10-22mm is a fun lens.

  7. #47
    Member
    Join Date
    23 Jul 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    655
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Last week I added a 5d classic to my list of gear, and while I didn't mind the 24-105 on my 7d, and still don't,But this lens is definitley more versitile on the 5d, so now I've decided to sell the 10-20 and get a 17-40 as this will give me UWA on the 5d and wide angle on the 7d.
    I now see why people love full frame.
    Jayde

    Honest CC whether good or bad, is much appreciated.
    Love and enjoy photography, but won't be giving up my day job.

    Flickr

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •