User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Hood for 17-55 F2.8,which one

  1. #1
    Member fairy bombs's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Sep 2009
    Location
    south east QLD,Australia
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Hood for 17-55 F2.8,which one

    Looking at purchasing a Canon 17-55 F 2.8 IS, I see D-D-P has them for $1265,which is a bit kinder to my wallet than the last time I saw the price (still a lot for a non L lens),anyhow-I need a lens with its specs,So if I buy it,I will then need to get a hood (more expense

    I had a look on D-D-P site,they have two options a $69 one asume thats a canon,and a generic for $39

    What have users of this lens found best??,i had heard on POTN that some generics are a little hard to get on -off,I then heard the Canon one has that felty type material,which given this lenes reputation for sucking dust,some users didnt like the canon one as in their opinons the material would collect dust that my get into lens,all of this may just be internet hyperbole,would like to hear some Aussies that use this lens and their findings.

    thank you for your help

    FB
    Canon 50D and 450D - Canon 10-22 F3.5-5.6, 17-55 F2.8 L, 70-200 F2.8 L, 400 prime F5.6 L, 60mm F2.8 macro, EX 430 Flash,and all sorts of other bits and pieces

  2. #2
    The Only Easy Day Was Yesterday
    Join Date
    27 Mar 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    549
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi fb,
    I've had the 17-55 for about 2 years and I don't believe it deserves the bad rep about "sucking dust" (none in mine yet) although most people do suggest fitting a good quality UV filter. I bought mine from DWI and as long as you don't mind buying "grey market" they are cheapest and provide quick service. From my experience if you are regularly fitting & removing the hood on a lens with this type of mount the generic copies wear out quicker... you can get a Canon hood a fair bit cheaper on the 'bay http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Canon-EW-83J-...item33590e59dd

    p.s. the "felty" stuff increases the effectiveness of the hood in minimising stray (reflected) light striking the lens.

    Cheers
    John


    EOS 1D MKIII x2, EOS 6D; Samyang 14 2.8 IF ED UMC, EF 17-40 4 L, EF 24-70 2.8 L, EF 50 1.4, EF 85 1.8, EF 70-200 2.8 L IS, EF 100 2.8 macro, EF 400 5.6 L, 1.4x II TC, EF25 ET; Speelite 580EX, 430EX; Nissin Di866II; Yongnuo YN560i/ii & YN460ii, YN622C's, RF602's; Gitzo GT3541XLS + Markins Q20i; Manfrotto 055XProB + Giottos MH1301; Manfrotto 680B c/w Kirk MPA-1; Tamrac Pro5, ThinkTank Airport Accelerator, Airport Antidote V2, Pro Speed Belt + Racing Harness + Modular Skin Set; Lightroom 5.3, Photoshop CS5.
    myflickr

    Scarlet letters aren't that bad.. I rather like L



  3. #3
    Member AndyC's Avatar
    Join Date
    31 Mar 2010
    Location
    Brisbane Australia
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the 17-55 F2.8 with canon hood. Totally agree with Wobbles.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •