Just a quick question, should you use your noise reduction ie noise ninja beforeor after ?
White balance/conversion, then noise reduce, then other PP, then sharpen last.
regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff
Odd answer I know. But recently I have found that some processes at the pixel level, introduce some noise. So what I am starting to do is sharpen and do noise reduction on layers. Then selectively mask each layer to get the result I want.
So my answer..do it all at once, on layers.
"It is one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it is another thing to make a portrait of who they are" - Paul Caponigro
Constructive Critique of my photographs is always appreciated
the whole image first often results in some graininess appearing in places, and if you then apply noise reduction to the whole image you mend up defeating the purpose of in the first place.
I've always sharpened last, last thing you want isnoise, not a good look
Gear : Nikon Goodness
Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
Please support Precious Hearts
Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated
I have spent far too long lately experimenting with exactly this and the best results I seem to be able to get are the following steps. This is Capture NX specific but ----
Convert NEF to TIFF after any "in camera settings" are changed if needed.
Noise reduction as needed and a low overall sharpen in Neat Image.
Levels etc. or the normal processing I normally do in Capture NX and then a final overall or selective sharpen ( depending on subject matter ) with high pass sharpen varying the strength and opacity to suit.
I cannot see any noise brought back in the final image due to , This of course relates to the D200 and D50 files which are guaranteed to have noise even at base levels straight out of the camera.
I have been experimenting with Nik Software's sharpen and noise reduction software of late. Certainly I have seen theirsoftware create noise in areas of plain colour (say nice blue sky).
I think both and noise reduction are ongoing tools for experimentation. Always worth checking out the latest versions and ideas on it, to see if something better has come along
Is there any difference inwhen processing the file (eg in Capture One) for further PP in Photoshop or would you recommend setting the sharpen value to 0 with the intention of in Photoshop?
Canon 5D Mk2 + EF 24-105 f/4 L IS + EF 85mm f/1.8 USM + Canon Speedlite 430EX II Flash Unit + expanding....
Pictorial examples of the way I am doing it.
1250 on a D200 is NOT the ideal setting.
From the top ---
Original NEF image and then a crop. In this case all I did to the original was alter white balance from direct sun to cloudy because it was --- cloudy.
The original converted to a TIFF and given 60% noise reduction and 50% "conservative setting" sharpen in Neat Image.
The TIFF then edited, levels etc. and a 60% high pass sharpen on luminence and 0% chrominance.
Yes, looking closely in the crop, in this one there is noise that has been brought back slightly with the final sharpen but on the overall picture it isn't all that bad IMHO.