User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  4
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 71

Thread: NTP Challenge: Aperture and Depth of Field (DOF)

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    23 Sep 2009
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    325
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nice post shaggy, those two shots provide a good example of how depth of field (and specifically a narrow depth of field) can be used to draw attention to, or highlight, the subject of interest. In shot #1 the viewers eyes are drawn immediately to the lizard's eyes/head region, where as in shot #2 (with the greater depth of field) the photo is very "busy" and the viewer's eye isn't really drawn to one particular area of the photo, and the background and foreground/subject of the photo tend to merge into one.

  2. #22
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Good example of the difference that aperture settings can make to the result. At least now with an understanding of that, if you have a friend say they wanted a nice photo of themselves, you would know how to isolate them from the background and get a creative result. Which is the idea of this particular challenge.
    "It is one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it is another thing to make a portrait of who they are" - Paul Caponigro

    Constructive Critique of my photographs is always appreciated
    Nikon, etc!

    RICK
    My Photography

  3. #23
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    11 Aug 2009
    Location
    Poith
    Posts
    844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good pics, shaggy!!

    As Stevo says, the greater the DoF, the busier the pic seems to be, ie more distractions.

    Can we have a new challenge now, Rick?
    AKA Andrew P.
    Gear: Nikon D7100, Nikon D90, Nikon 18-105mm VR, Nikon 70-300mm VR, Sigma 150-500mm APO DG OS, , Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM, Tamron 90mm Macro Di, SB400 speedlight, SB700 speedlight, Nikon DR-6, Panasonic FH20, and all sorts of stuff

  4. #24
    Member David's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Apr 2009
    Location
    westbury
    Posts
    1,255
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Had a question here but put it elsewhere because the genre Im thinking of is landcapes, not this type.
    Comments and CC welcome..

    Gear: Canon 6D & 1Ds Cameras l Canon EF 17-40mm F 4.0 L USM l Canon EF 24-105mm F4.0 L IS USM l Canon EF 70 - 200 F4.0 L USM Lenses I Manfrotto Tripods I Adobe Photoshop CS6 l Lightroom 3.0 I Lee Filters



    "The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes." Marcel Proust 1871 - 1922

  5. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    22 May 2009
    Location
    Stanthorpe, Queensland
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the comments. I apologise for getting ahead of myself and will now crawl before I try and walk.

  6. #26
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    11 Aug 2009
    Location
    Poith
    Posts
    844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't have to apologise, shaggy, sometimes it's a good way to learn

  7. #27
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    13 Oct 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    513
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Since my trusty D100 has spent most of its life on P mode I decided to start learning a little more about its features & working through the challenges is a great place to start. I am doing an online course at the moment that I paid for but I am learning a lot more here form looking at other people photos & critiques & reading all the beginner info ( thanks Rick)
    So as my DOF I was a little limited as I had my two kids & my nephew to watch so was somewhat housebound so I lined up their morning tea.
    Because it was indoors & the light wasn't great & I don't like the built in flash I upped the iso to 800... so unfortunately they are somewhat grainy but I think they illustrated the DOF thing ok. In the wide aperture F3.5 the front pear only is in focus & this seem to bring all the attention onto it & blur out other distracting elements. The narrow aperture was at F20 & in this aside from the grainyness ( due to poor light, high iso) all elements are essentially in focus...including things like the kitchen wall & bar stools. This makes the picture more about all visible elements & less about the pear! I used a 60mm nikkor lens.

    wide.jpg
    narrow.jpg
    Dee

    Nikon D700 , 28-200mm zoom lens, 60mm micro nikkor.

  8. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    13 Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,048
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thats a spot on example of DOF using Aperture selection .. Well done Edenjane

    Ill just touch on something else (seeing as this is the Aperture/DOF thread ill be brief)

    Take a look at your exif and note what happened to your shutter speed when you stopped down to f20 .. much much slower right ?? 1/160th down to 1/6th. I mention it because its a good indication of how two elements of the exposure triangle work in conjunction with each other. But thats a discussion for another thread .. just thought it was a good example.

    Well done ..
    Hi Im Darren

    www.darrengrayphotography.com

    SONY A850 (FF)] + GRIP | SONY A350 (APS-C) + GRIP | SONY NEX-5 +16 2.8 + 18-55 E-MOUNT LENSES | CZ 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-75 2.8 | 70-200 2.8 | 2 x 42AMs | 24" imac | LR | CS4 | + loads of other junk


  9. #29
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    13 Oct 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    513
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you getting my head around the interactions between all these things is going to be my next task. I just noticed I had my exposure compensation on -0.7 from a previous session..oops..that might explain what they are somewhat on the dark side! I plan to do the SSspeed challenge next.

  10. #30
    Member Newbie79's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Nov 2009
    Location
    Central QLD
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    My Attempt - Av Mode - DOF

    Hi all, This is the first NTP challenge that I have done and my first attempt at posting.

    I have taken four photos which I am posting. All photos were taken on Av mode of my camera and so all i changed was the f value between each set of photos.

    Image one was taken at f22 and is of the Bonsai in the white pot in the fore ground. What I notice is that virtually everything in the photo is in focus and that because of this the bonsai is lost in all the other plants surrounding it. Image 2 is taken at f 5.6 and the first thing I notice is that the Bonsai seems to stand out from everything else (even from all the other plants) because it seems to be the only thing in focus. I also notice that the further back in the photo you look the more out of focus it seems to be (The other bonsai is less out of focus than the black bin in the background)

    Image 3 is taken at f 22 and image 4 at f3.5 The comments i made above also seem to be true of these two photos with the exception that the difference between how much the background in each photo is out of focus seems to be much more subtle. If someone can please tell me if I am right or not but from the reading i have done this is because there is such a small distance between the front of the photo and the back (the fence)??? Is this right?

    I know the photos are not master pieces but I am hoping they illustrate what I was meant to learn from the Challenge?

    Thanks heaps

    Matt
    Attached Images Attached Images

  11. #31
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Good work Matt. Hope this taught you what the aperture does to your photo, and as you progress through the learning centre and the other challenges you will learn how to combine camera functions to achieve the desired result that you wanted.

    What did you notice about the shutter speed as you changed the aperture?

  12. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I hope you dont mind, but can I add a couple of hard learnt lessons that I have found

    Before deciding what apperture to choose, look at the background and think about what effect on that background changing your apperture will have....eg if a person is standing next to a wall it really will not matter to how the wall will look in the picture if you shoot at f/8 or f/1.8 but you'll get a much sharper picture at F/8

    So, dont shoot wide open just because you can.
    Darren
    Gear : Nikon Goodness
    Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
    Please support Precious Hearts
    Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated

  13. #33
    Member Newbie79's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Nov 2009
    Location
    Central QLD
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ricktas,

    In answer to your question I noticed that the larger the aperture (smaller the f number) the quicker the shutter speed was. I am assuming this is because more light can get in at once the smaller the f number is.

    I tried taking some more photos last night inside the house and noticed that the larger the aperture became the shutter needed to open for so long that it was impossible to hold the camera still long enough. I am assuming this again is a lighting issue?

    A Question!

    If I was taking a picture of object A and object B was behind this and then Object C was further behind again what would be the easiest way to work out how to keep both Object A and B in focus whilst having Object C out of focus. I guess i'm asking how can i quickly work out what my DOF will be before taking the photo so that I can keep the object I want in focus?

    Thanks Matt

  14. #34
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Re your question, the easiest way (other than experimentation) is to use a Depth of Field calculator. You put in the camera, lens details, the distance to subject, etc, and it tells you the distance front to back that will be in focus.

    A good online example is here: http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

  15. #35
    Member Newbie79's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Nov 2009
    Location
    Central QLD
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi all,

    Have been taking quite a few photos of different things practicing using Av mode and altering the DOF. Just thought I would share these with you all. Was amazed that i could control the DOF over such a small distance (from the front of my wedding ring to the back). One was taken at f 5.6 and the other at f22

    Things are starting to make sense to me now. Thanks for your time.

    Matt
    Attached Images Attached Images

  16. #36
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    11 Aug 2009
    Location
    Poith
    Posts
    844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Great pics there Matt, definitely can see the difference between the different f/ numbers

  17. #37
    Site Rules Breach - Permanent Ban
    Join Date
    11 Dec 2009
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    69
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok, just shot at the first thing I saw... nothing very creative here.

    ISO left at 100, first shot is f/4 and second shot is f/22

    f/4 brought the shutter speed to 1/100 (a lot faster) whereas f/22 brought the shutter speed to 1/6.

    This caused the DOF to increase with f/22...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    • File Type: jpg 4.jpg (80.7 KB, 220 views)
    • File Type: jpg 22.jpg (97.3 KB, 215 views)

  18. #38
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    08 May 2009
    Location
    Buninyong
    Posts
    1,232
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You got it! Now along with the shutter speed challenge you did, you can see how you can use these aspects to your advantage to achieve a certain effect when shooting subjects.
    Mic

    Photography is the art of telling stories with light.

    www.michaelgoulding.com

  19. #39
    Site Rules Breach - Permanent Ban
    Join Date
    11 Dec 2009
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    69
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cheers. Was thinking I'd go back to the road scene from shutter speed challenge and shoot there again but with the change in aperture settings for comparison's sakes - is this worthwhile?

  20. #40
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    08 May 2009
    Location
    Buninyong
    Posts
    1,232
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you go back and look at the photos from the road you will see the aperture was changing itself to suit the shutter speed. In Aperture priority mode your camera will select the best shutter speed to get the correct exposure and if shutter priority mode the camera will select the right aperture to get the correct exposure. Which ever selection you choose they will give the same result.

    Try it at home, put you camera on Av select F8 and point it at something. Note the shutter speed it picks. Then flick it over to shutter priority and select the shutter speed you just noted. Point it at the same subject (with the same lighting) and it should be close to F8.

    When out shooting subjects the trick is to think what your priority is, are you trying for shallow depth of field or freezing action etc...which will determine which mode you use.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •