User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Digital Lens Range Compared to SLR Range

  1. #1
    Account Closed
    Join Date
    22 Feb 2008
    Location
    **Suburb/Town Required**
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Digital Lens Range Compared to SLR Range

    I've read that SLR lenses on Digital SLR cameras have more zoom or something, is this right ?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    13 Jun 2009
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think youre referring to DX body cameras. The crop factor on the image sensor gives a 1.5x amplification to the lens focal length. e.g. a 200mm lens on a DX format digital camera would give a 300mm equivalent.

  3. #3
    It's all about the Light!
    Tech Admin
    Kym's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury, Adelaide
    Posts
    9,641
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by A.W.Pfeiffer View Post
    I've read that SLR lenses on Digital SLR cameras have more zoom or something, is this right ?
    A 300mm lens is always a 300mm lens.
    The difference is the cropping - it is not additional magnification as such; although it appears the way in practice.

    The explains it quite well... (at least the first half of the article)
    http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tut...ensor-size.htm

    Another explanation:
    http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tu...dslr-mag.shtml
    regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
    Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff



  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    28 Aug 2008
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    1,913
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    in a nutshell, the focal length, say 300mm will still be 300mm

    but the FIELD of VIEW changes, not the focal length

    a 200mm lens on a 1.5x crop sensor will provide a 300mm image due to the change in field of view

  5. #5
    Administrator ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    15,641
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    As the others have said, a 300mm lens is a 300mm lens, It is a set physical size and cannot magically become a different size cause it is placed on a cropped sensor body. The factor that is different is the sensor size.

    To get an understanding have a look at this diagram

    It shows how a smaller sensor grabs the image that comes through the lens. Cause it grabs a smaller area (cropped) it appears to be zoomed in more, but really all it is doing is missing all the date the lens can capture that is outside the sensors 'view'.

    Note the diagram in this instance uses Nikon Nomenclature:

    Fx - Full frame - 35mm sensor
    Dx - Cropped sensor
    5:4 - The Nikon D3 allows capture in a 5:4 format as well.
    "It is one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it is another thing to make a portrait of who they are" - Paul Caponigro

    Constructive Critique of my photographs is always appreciated
    Nikon, etc!

    RICK
    My Photography

  6. #6
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    27 May 2009
    Location
    Northern Beaches - Sydney
    Posts
    774
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gas Man View Post
    I've read that SLR lenses on Digital SLR cameras have more zoom or something, is this right ?
    The other thing to mention is that it doesn't matter if it's a DX or FX lens, you will get the same effect. ie a 200mm DX lens will give the same effective length as a 200mm Full Frame lens on a DX body.

    DX lenses are smaller in diameter, so they don't cover the full size sensor.
    David

    Nikon D810
    Nikkor AF-S 24-120VR, Nikkor AF-S 16-35VR, Nikkor AF-S 70-300VR, Nikkor AF 50 f1.8
    Tamron 90mm Macro

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    09 Oct 2009
    Location
    Semaphore Park
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The other players in the field are Olympus/Pany Leica, which have a 4/3 system that has a smaller sensor again, with a 2x conversion factor. So an Oly 50-200 zoom will give you the same effective distance as a 100-400 on a 'full frame' (35mm) sensor. A smaller, lighter system but not as good under really low light. Outstanding quality glass, edge to edge sharpness, weathersealed (mid - pro range) - but it is what they call a 4/3 system. Horses for courses.
    IngridM

    Nikon: D700, D300, Grip, 70-200VR, Nikkor 24-70, 14-24, 105VR, Nikkor 300/F4, SB900. For the kids: Olympus: E420 twin lens kit
    Adobe PSE 8, Capture One
    Wish list: Nikon 200-400, 1.7 TC
    http://ingridmatschke.smugmug.com

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Dec 2008
    Location
    Ferntree Gully, Victoria
    Posts
    28
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There is also the fact that the 4/3rd lenses are specifically made for digital cameras as in the light falls onto the sensor is at a 90 degree angle, where as other lenses the further away from the centre of the lens the angle the light hitting the sensor is increased.
    Regards
    Wayne
    "We are not actually lost,....... just temporarily misplaced."
    DSLR - Olympus OMD EM1, E5, E3, E1, E30 Digital lens 12-40m pro, 14-54 f2.8-3.5 II, 40-150 f3.5-4.5, 70-300 F4-5.6 ED, 9-18 ED, Olympus C-750 + TCON-17,
    Filters, Circular Polariser, Neutral Density, 2 X Battery Grip, Photoshop CS6, Focus Magic, Nik Plugin
    SLR - OM1, Ricoh XR10 Lens - 135
    My photos - http://www.pbase.com/cherryw

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •