User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Question about Canon 450D supplied software

  1. #1
    Member Nic076's Avatar
    Join Date
    05 Jan 2008
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question about Canon 450D supplied software

    Hi guys

    No I have not crossed to the darkside , but have a friend who just purchased a new 450D. We loaded the software on his computer but I am after a few hints and tips for him about which programs to use. It seems he has the following programs installed on the desktop after running the CD :

    Digital Photo Prof
    EOS Utility
    Picture Style Editor
    Zoom Browser

    I mentioned to him that possibly a lot of users would not use the canon software but opt for Photoshop

    Any help on what the programs do & what he should use would be wonderful.

    Thanks

    Nic
    Olympus E-510 | Kit lenses Olympus 14mm- 42mm, 40mm- 150mm & newly acquired 50mm f/2
    Photoshop Elements 6 | Velbon Tripod |FL-36 Electronic Flash

    Next on the hit list is Sigma 10mm - 20mm

    Any comments and critique welcome.

  2. #2
    can't remember
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Ballarat
    Posts
    2,010
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi Nic.

    Zoom Browser is a competent image viewer, perfectly OK to use for reviewing and light-duty editing, but most people will prefer a best-of-breed 3rd-party one such as PMView, XNView, ThumbsPlus, Irfanview, or etc. Nevertheless, Zoom Browser is fine if that's all you have.

    The Picture Style Editor is .... well ... I've never quite worked out what you would use it for.

    The EOS Utility has that typically clunky old-school feel to the interface that manufacturer-supplied software so often does, and it can be a bit difficult to find the function you want in it sometimes, but it does a surprisingly wide range of tasks, mostly special-purpose stuff. The only thing I have ever used it for is to set the camera clocks to the computer clock so that all my bodies are synchronised with each other, but it does a heap of other stuff too if you happen to need a particular function.

    Digital Photo Professional (DPP) is by far the most useful software in the Canon pack: it's a full-featured raw converter. Do not be misled by the old-school look and clunky feel: DPP is as powerful a raw converter as any on the market today. Quite a few Canon users reckon that DPP's results are better than those of any other converter. Certainly, it is unmatched for accurate colour rendering. It is also the only raw converter which can, if you wish, give you exactly what you would have got if you'd used the in-camera JPG engine instead. DPP is also the only raw converter which always fully understands Canon raw file format, including any new features introduced with a new model, for example Highlight Tone Priority. (Contrast this with, e.g., Adobe Camera Raw or Bibble.) Best of all, it's free, and if you own any version of it (i.e., if you have ever bought a Canon camera), you can download and use the latest version as often as you like. I mostly use Camera Raw. (Because, believe it or not, I like the user interface better - and I can't believe I just said that about an Adobe product ... I mean, Adobe are the world champions of broken, counter-intuitive, clumsy, and otherwise unfriendly user interfaces, so how come they didn't mess Camera Raw up like all their other products?) Whatever: the DPP interface is clunky, verging on the primitive, but it's quite fast, much more flexible than you think when you first try it, and produces beautiful results.

    None of the Canon free software items re Photoshop replacements, but they are all usable and useful in some way, and DPP is well worth having.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    18 Jun 2006
    Location
    Echuca
    Posts
    65
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for a great explanation Tony, I tried to like DPP but agree with your comments about the interface and feel of it, but I'm learning slowly and may just give it another go, I was happy enough with RSE until Adobe inhaled it as the basis for Lightroom.
    My Image Policy: Feel free to comment or edit as you wish.

    Rebel XT
    Canon 18-55 kit
    Canon 50 f1.8
    Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 EX DC HSM
    Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX DG macro
    Sigma 70-200 f2.8 EX APO HSM
    Sigma 150 f2.8 EX APO Macro DG HSM
    Canon 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS USM
    Sigma 135-400 f4.5-5.6 APO
    Sigma EF-500 DG Super

    http://spacejunk2.deviantart.com/


  4. #4
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Nic076's Avatar
    Join Date
    05 Jan 2008
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks Tony I will pass on the info. Really appreciate your in depth answer. Cheers again

  5. #5
    Serial Truant.... phild's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Jun 2008
    Location
    Launceston
    Posts
    516
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quite a few Canon users reckon that DPP's results are better than those of any other converter
    I've found that to be the case, DPP will produce sharper images with cleaner noise than Adobe ACR. I do all my raw processing in DPP and finish off with PS or Lightroom if necessary.
    Phil

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •