User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Something for HDR Photomatrix Trial Users

  1. #1
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Join Date
    22 Jul 2008
    Location
    Rosebud, Mornington Peninsula
    Posts
    2,839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Something for HDR Photomatrix Trial Users

    Checked with Rick before I posted this and as such all is ok to post

    This was a trial and error thing I found playing with the software - For those using the Photomatrix trial and you don't want watermarks on the pics - Resize the pics you are using (before you make it the HDR) to a 799 width (has to be less than 800 - havent played too much with the height but i think its more on width this thing) before you do the HDR.

    So far all I have done this way have never watermarked - Maybe a slight little programming bug on their side but yeah you can get a reasonable sized pic without a water mark
    Last edited by Miaow; 10-06-2009 at 7:02pm.
    Cat (aka Cathy) - Another Canon user - 400D, 18-55,75-300mm Kit Lens,50mm f1.8, Tamron 90mm f2.8 Macro, Sigma 28-70 f2.8-4 DG, Tripod and a willingness to learn
    Software used: PhotoImpact, Irfanview and a lot of plugins
    We don't make a photograph just with a camera, we bring to the act of photography all the books we have read, the movies we have seen, the music we have heard, the people we have loved. - Ansel Adams


  2. #2
    Way Down Yonder in the Paw Paw Patch jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jun 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Interesting, might try it. It's a reasonable size for posting to AP, but small enough you can't really call it a rip-off.

  3. #3
    Account Closed reaction's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    792
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Interesting, maybe their watermarks' too big for a 799 pic?

  4. #4
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    22 Jul 2008
    Location
    Rosebud, Mornington Peninsula
    Posts
    2,839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah maybe it is something on the watermark size? I only discovered it cause of playing with small files and finding it didn't do it so i sorta expeimented on the sizes and found 799 was ok but 800 would watermark
    So far i haven't had it water mark at 799 pixels width - I did a test the other day with the newest trial version and it didn't watermark - wasn't sure if it was something in the older versions they might have fixed up (one i used to use when I found it was an older version).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •