User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: 50mm prime or 17-70 for party photos??

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    25 Jun 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    50mm prime or 17-70 for party photos??

    Hi everyone

    I'm taking photos tonight at my sisters 21st. Which lens should I use - 50mm f1.4 or my 17-70? I will also be using my new sigma flash. I'm thinking take both just in case, but I think I might get better results out of the 50mm, but like the idea of having some room to move with a bit of zoom.

    Thanks in advance
    Ellen
    Ellen
    Pentax K10D, the newest baby
    Sigma 17-70mm
    Sigma 70-300mm
    Pentax 50mm f1.4
    Sigma EF-530 DG ST Flash
    Whats next????

    Please CC my photos, and edit where you want! Got lots to learn so please pass on instructions....

  2. #2
    Administrator ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Take the 17-70, and if you have something like a 70-200 take that as well. Getting good candid shots can mean being away from your subject and getting that shot across the venue, the longer focal length can come in handy. Certainly the 17-70 gives you some good scope to zoom in or out a bit. The 50mm is good, but you might find yourself wishing for something wider when you go for group shots etc.
    "It is one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it is another thing to make a portrait of who they are" - Paul Caponigro

    Constructive Critique of my photographs is always appreciated
    Nikon, etc!

    RICK
    My Photography

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    09 Aug 2006
    Location
    Echuca
    Posts
    460
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The 17-70 would give you more flexibility at taking individual and group shots.

    A matter of interest...... From EXIF infomation, I wrote down all the focal lengths used at the last wedding I photographed, they were between 18-112mm, not too many shots at each end of the scale, more in the 28-85mm range. It was an interesting exercise, although time consuming.

    An honest C+C please!


    "I started life with nothing and I still have most of it left"

    Nikon D300
    Photoshop CS4 Extended



  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hmm, Harves, there is a software program that can do that automatically for you, I can dig it up if you like

    Yeah, take both, if its really poor lighting or you struggle with the new flash the 1.4 might be handy. It's only little
    Darren
    Gear : Nikon Goodness
    Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
    Please support Precious Hearts
    Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    15 Jun 2007
    Location
    Newcastle, NSW
    Posts
    129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wot they said. I would use the 50 for 'hey guys, want me to take a photo of you?' shots, and a zoom for the candids.
    Cheers,
    Chris.

    MY
    __________

    Canon EOS 7D w grip | Canon 17-40mm f/4L USM | Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS USM | Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS USM | Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM | Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM | Canon 580EX II speedlight | Cokin ND Grad system


  6. #6
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    25 Jun 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thanks heaps guys!!! hopefully will be able to post some rippers tomorrow

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    09 Aug 2006
    Location
    Echuca
    Posts
    460
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kiwi View Post
    hmm, Harves, there is a software program that can do that automatically for you, I can dig it up if you like
    Thanks for the offer Darren, I just did it out of curiousity that's all

  8. #8
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    8,777
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kiwi View Post
    hmm, Harves, there is a software program that can do that automatically for you, I can dig it up if you like.....
    I reckon Darren is referring to:

    Exposure Plot is a brilliant lil program that helps you analyse what focal lengths you have a preference for.

    In this instance, it'd be used to plot the most common focal length used for a given event, and allow you to see where your preference lies.

    Harves, this thing is so much easier than doing it manually!
    Nikon D800E, D300, D70s
    {Nikon}; -> 50/1.2 : 500/8 : 105/2.8VR Micro : 180/2.8 ais : 105mm f/1.8 ais : 24mm/2 ais
    {Sigma}; ->10-20/4-5.6 : 50/1.4 : 12-24/4.5-5.6II : 150-600mm|S
    {Tamron}; -> 17-50/2.8 : 28-75/2.8 : 70-200/2.8 : 300/2.8 SP MF : 24-70/2.8VC

    {Yongnuo}; -> YN35/2N : YN50/1.8N


  9. #9
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    19 Jan 2007
    Location
    Perth, Straya
    Posts
    1,242
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a 17-70mm and can recommend it as an all round lens and wouldbe good for your purpose as the zoom would come in handy.

    The 50mm would be handy, however you might be in a bit of trouble if you a wanting the 50mm to act as just at on a a non FF camera. A 32mm is effectively a 50mm on a 1.6 crop.

    While we are on the 17-70mm* can someone confirm the white dot between the 24m and the next increment on the zoom ring is 50mm? TIA.
    "Nature photography is about choosing a location, crawling through dirt, being bitten by insects and occasionally taking a great image". - Wayne Eddy.

    Canon 5D MkIII, Canon 7D, 17-40mm f/4L,
    24-105mm f/4L
    + Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS +400mm f/5.6L + Canon 1.4xTC + Canon 100 EF f2.8 USM + 430-EX


  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    25 Jun 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep, what others said, I'd go with the 17-70... 50 may not give you wide enough angle sometimes I think.... but it's a great lens so maybe take both?

    Actually, the partys probably over by now. Hope you had fun!
    Cheers,
    Terri



    Nikon D90 | Olympus XZ-1 | Nikkor 35mm f1.8 | Nikon 17-55mm f2.8 | Nikon 105mm f2.8 Micro | Nikon 50mm f1.4 | Nikon 18-105mm VR | Photoshop Element 7.0 | Manfrotto 190X

  11. #11
    Moderately Underexposed
    Join Date
    04 May 2007
    Location
    Marlo, Far East Gippsland
    Posts
    4,902
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Terri View Post

    Actually, the partys probably over by now. Hope you had fun!
    It is a 21st so it is probably just getting into top gear as we write these posts Terri.

    At least that is how parties used to go when I was that age, I think, errrr, the memory isn't that good anymore.

    C'mon Ellen, it's tomorrow already and you promised us some pics from the party, waiting waiting waiting ----------
    Andrew
    Nikon, Fuji, Nikkor, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina and too many other bits and pieces to list.



  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    25 Nov 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    97
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Since you have a flash, I would go with the 17-70, The 50mm would get better shots but restricted, however the 17-70 allowed you to play with angles.
    Site: DzR Photography
    Flickr: Flickr

    Camera: Sony A350 DSLR
    Lenses: 18-70mm, 55-200mm, 50mm f1.4, 70-300G, Minolta 35-70mm f4, Tamron 17-50 2.8
    Flash: Sony HVLF42AM
    Tripod: 190xPROB, 488RC4
    Memory: Sandisk Extreme 200x CF
    Software: Adobe Photoshop CS3 + RAW

  13. #13
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    29 Nov 2008
    Location
    River Murray
    Posts
    728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    50mm is my pick, it will have two advantages. Firstly the image quality is better and secondly, it is going to be two to four and a half stops faster! If you want wider, then take a few steps back. If you want closer, then approach the subject. Getting good candid shots is about making your subjects feel comfortable. Shooting from across the room with them not knowing your are there is not a good plan of attack. And pointing an SLR with a huge zoom lens on the front can seem intimidating for some people. The 1.4/50mm will allow you to isolate your subject by using the big apeture of the 1.4 and also some nice low light shots.

  14. #14
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    25 Jun 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by I @ M View Post
    It is a 21st so it is probably just getting into top gear as we write these posts Terri.

    At least that is how parties used to go when I was that age, I think, errrr, the memory isn't that good anymore.

    C'mon Ellen, it's tomorrow already and you promised us some pics from the party, waiting waiting waiting ----------
    hehe Terri - the party was just getting started! Not really, we were still out but not far from coming home by that stage.........

    I didnt end up taking photos myself, I wanted to have a good time so I palmed it off to my 10 year old cousin, who by the way, did a great job! I looked over several times to see her directing her subjects into a group shot, looked like a total pro! Although I havent seen the photos yet - my uncle left my camera bag and laptop bag in the cab and very very very luckily for us (and particularly him!!!!!!) the cabbie was honest and handed it in to the cops so still yet to go pick it up. Last time I trust him with my stuff!!

    We had the 17-70mm on it all night. And I'm pretty sure it was the right choice, so we'll see......

    Thanks for the advice guys!!

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    25 Jun 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ellen View Post
    Although I havent seen the photos yet - my uncle left my camera bag and laptop bag in the cab and very very very luckily for us (and particularly him!!!!!!) the cabbie was honest and handed it in to the cops so still yet to go pick it up. Last time I trust him with my stuff!!
    Oh my goodness! My heart started beating too fast when I read this bit. So glad it was handed in, and hope your head's not too sore

  16. #16
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    25 Jun 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Terri View Post
    Oh my goodness! My heart started beating too fast when I read this bit. So glad it was handed in, and hope your head's not too sore
    Thanks Terri..... So am I!!!!!! I'll give him hell for a week or two! We didnt even know it was missing until the police called at 7am which scared the hell out of my mum!! My heads not too sore, although I haven't been that well this morning Maccas at 4:30am always seems like a good idea at the time! LOL!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •