User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 45

Thread: NTP: Challenge VI

  1. #21
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Good result there Graeme. Certainly improves your photo eh?, The shadows/highlights tool can be reasonably effective, but it is limited.
    "It is one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it is another thing to make a portrait of who they are" - Paul Caponigro

    Constructive Critique of my photographs is always appreciated
    Nikon, etc!

    RICK
    My Photography

  2. #22
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    14 Sep 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    740
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Graeme there is a very handy device in Bridge Camera Raw where you can open an image as an object, in Photoshop that becomes editble in camera raw always.

    Step one. Do your fine tuning in Camera Raw, open as an obeject by holding down the shift key and clicking Open Object, (normal mode is Open Image) when open in Photoshop Mac, Ctl click, PC, right click to the right of the layer's name and choose New Smart Object via copy, you can now adjust each layer independently of each other, reopen this layer in Camera Raw and adjust for another part of the image, ie; the foreground in the first layer and the sky in the second, they can then be masked to get the best out of the image, this is a particularly good way of editing for landscapes. Hope this helps and makes sense.

    Give me a PM Graeme and we will try and get together soon. Margaret
    Margaret

    Fuji XT2 Manfrotto MF 055XPROB Pro Tripod & gynbal head, Fuji 18-55 mm, Fuji 14 mm, Fuji 55-200 mm, Fuji 80 mm macro, Fuji 60mm macro, Fuji 100-400 mm, SB600 Speedlight, Photoshop, Lightroom on a Mac, Critiques welcomed


  3. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    13 Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,048
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ive been playing around tweaking a few old shots and thought id post this one up as my example ..

    Hi Im Darren

    www.darrengrayphotography.com

    SONY A850 (FF)] + GRIP | SONY A350 (APS-C) + GRIP | SONY NEX-5 +16 2.8 + 18-55 E-MOUNT LENSES | CZ 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-75 2.8 | 70-200 2.8 | 2 x 42AMs | 24" imac | LR | CS4 | + loads of other junk


  4. #24
    Member Nic076's Avatar
    Join Date
    05 Jan 2008
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nice colours Darren.

    Some great photos in this thread, well done to all. Here is my attempt from our trip this week.

    Olympus E-510 | Kit lenses Olympus 14mm- 42mm, 40mm- 150mm & newly acquired 50mm f/2
    Photoshop Elements 6 | Velbon Tripod |FL-36 Electronic Flash

    Next on the hit list is Sigma 10mm - 20mm

    Any comments and critique welcome.

  5. #25
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Great work Nic. Lovely landscape. like how the sweep of the beach curves at a rule of thirds point. However your horizon is central vertically, and your horizon is sloped slightly downhill to the left of the photo.

    Lovely scene and a great landscape photograph

  6. #26
    As Keen As Mustard NikonNellie's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Jan 2009
    Location
    North West, Sydney
    Posts
    4,925
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I took this photo in January '09 so I hope it's OK for this post. I am unable to get out and about at the moment as I have torn a tendon in my foot. The photo was taken at Freshwater Beach at sunset - it was one of the first low light shots I had ever taken. It probably doesn't sit on the Rule of Thirds but I wanted to keep the bird in the shot.

    CAMERA: Nikon D800, Nikon D7000
    LENSES: AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8, Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Macro, Sigma 10 - 20mm F/4 - 5.6, Sigma 150 - 500mm F/5 - 6.3 APO DG OS, Nikkor 18 - 200mm F/3.5 - 5.6 VRII,
    Sigma 70 - 200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS, Tamron SP 24 - 70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD, Sigma 85mm F/1.4 EX DG, Nikkor AF-S 16-35mm F/4 ED VR, Nikkor AF-S 200-500 f/5..6E ED VR
    MY WEBSITES: www.nawimages.com, http://nelliewajzerphotography.smugmug.com/, http://NellieWajzerPhotography.blogspot.com



  7. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    18 Apr 2009
    Location
    Albury
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi, very new here.
    Not too sure it fits the Rule of Thirds, but thought I'd post it anyway. It's not the best photo (compared to what's already been posted). Was done with a Canon Powershot A570 IS as it's all I took on that particular trip. Was taken at Wellington Dam in WA.


    After looking at more closely, really should've moved closer to the shore line.

  8. #28
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Really good use of the Rule of Thirds Narelle. Horizon 1/3 of the way down, headland coming in from the right about a 1/3rd of the way into the image, and the foreground rock placed well. Nice light coming onto the rock to bring out the colour and texture. Very well done.

  9. #29
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Welcome Remin. Very good try, the road leading up the left side fits the Rule of Thirds reasonably well. The horizon is a bit to central and the guys in the boat are very central as well. As you have noted, getting closer to the shoreline would have helped here. Very nice scene and its sad seeing another Dam so low (waterwise).

  10. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    18 Apr 2009
    Location
    Albury
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My mates and I went fishing tonight, I took my cameras along and here is the results. Everything here was done using the SX10.






    There are some others, check here:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/3751583...7616980587188/
    Canon EOS 300V (Film)
    Sony A6400
    flickr

  11. #31
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Nice shots there Remin. But the challenge is about using the rule of thirds, all your photos have the horizon in the centre of the photo (top to bottom). Maybe go have a read of the Learning Centre topics suggested at the start of this thread.

    Also, please don't post more than one photo at a time in these challenges. If you want general critique, please put your photos in the member photo's area of the site. The NTP challenges are for each member to present one photo, get advice on improving it, then going out and work on improving based on the challenge topic.

  12. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    24 Jan 2009
    Location
    mid north coast
    Posts
    118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    finally time to come back to this thread! I took heaps of photos and had a re-think before i clicked the shutter button to see if i could change my angle to give a better rule of thirds. Here are a couple.
    Funnily enough just scrolling through my blog since the day of this challenge to my more recent posts and there are heaps jumping out at me that i want to post here but i won't! I'll choose two that at the time i was trying for the thirds rule but looking at them now i wonder if there are too many other elements in the photos that don't fit the rule that are enough to unbalance things.

    With this one the horizon is close to being one third up but not exactly... is it enough? or do you find that it really needs to be as close to visually thirds as you can get to have the right effect? When i took it i thought the tree gave a god 'one third' on the right but now that i relook for this challenge the overhead rock is half way across the top so if that enough to counter-act the effect we are aiming for?
    (Hoping the photo shows up... First time trying to not upload direct to AP...)

    Here is a photo of me! THe horizon is closer to thirds and the boulder with me on it is the other third... but again has the grass being half at the bottom ruined the rule?


    But for a photo that i think really matches the guidelines i'd pick this one (i'll just link it to save posting too many photos)
    Chelle.
    I've had my camera on AUTO for far too long... learning the ropes on my Sony A300.
    C&C welcome - but keep it simple!
    I'm more interested in capturing memories than in taking the best photo ever (that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it!)

  13. #33
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I fixed them for you Chelle! You had the IMG tags in but had also put URL tags around them as well.

    Please only post one photo at a time in the NTP area though, as it is not a general critique area, and is designed for each member to present one photo, get feedback on that one, then go out and work on improving.

    I will comment on the first. Well used Rule of thirds, by placing the rocks and tree around the outside of your photo. Horizon is well placed, I like how the rocks and trees 'frame' the photo. Having then positioned yourself so the middle distant boulders are through the frame has worked well. Good work, No the 1/3 is only a guide, you don't have to be precise, but as you can see, by using the Rule of Thirds, you create a very visually pleasing photo, it just feels 'right'

  14. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    24 Jan 2009
    Location
    mid north coast
    Posts
    118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    oops, i may have unfixed them cos i tried editting it again and you must have already done it.
    sorry for posting two images (i sorta knew i was not supposed to! :hide: ) but i had the same question for them both re whether you needed to have as many elements as possible as thirds or if something prominant being half-half ruined it.

  15. #35
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I will fix them for you again Chelle.

    EDIT - there appears to be an anomoly in the way blogspot names its image links, your original links wont work on AP, but if I copy them into my browser, go to the photo, right click the photo on blogspot, click properties and then copy the link that appears in the pop-up window, that link will work with AP, there is a slight change to the name of the link between the two. Something to watch Chelle, so always use the right click, properties link on the photo on blogspot and then paste that link into AP using the icon to make sure it pasted as an IMG link

  16. #36
    Member sketty's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Apr 2009
    Location
    **Suburb/Town Required**
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    OK here's my example:



    Not brilliant, but I ruined my last session by leaving the ISO at 1600 = a whole load of noise!
    so this one'll have to do for now
    Olympus E-620
    ZD 12-60 SWD f/2.8-4.0, ZD 70-300 f/4.0-5.6
    ZD 14-40mm f/3.5-5.6 (kit), ZD 42-150mm f/4-5.6 (kit), ZD 35mm f/3.5 Macro
    Cokin filter holder and ND grads, CPL filters, Velbon 600R Tripod

    My pictures on Flickr
    I'm here to learn so feel free to rework my photos if you think improvements can be made!

  17. #37
    Member Hamish McHaggis's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 May 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here is my attempt at the challenge, and also my thoughts on the photo:


    Composition: the horizon is in the upper third (well, 5th probably) of the frame. It (the horizon) is bendy, though, probably can be fixed in PS. There is foreground interest; however the main rock is in the centre of the frame – could be better composed.
    Exposure: the long exposure has allowed the water to become “milky” – I like this, but the upper third of the pic has consequently been overexposed. I applied a grad filter in LR to deal with this but am not too happy with the result.
    Colour – let’s not go there! I’m red/green colour blind and therefore have interesting ideas about colour, usually reflected (badly) in my choice of fashion, LOL. I think while I’m learning about photography I’m going to try to think in terms of shapes, lines and contrast and probably in B&W as well.
    Focus: I want this pic to be sharper, to reveal the details in the rocks that I saw when I took it – any tips??
    thanks,
    Colin
    Colin
    Here to learn; please critique and/or rework my images

  18. #38
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Great use of the rule of thirds there Sketty and Colin. I like how your horse's face runs straight down a rule of thirds line there Sketty.

    Colin, very nice long exposure sea-scape. To fix the bendy horizon in photoshop. Filters> Distort>Lens Correction, there are perspective adjustment tools in there, use the sliders till you get the horizon level, click OK and then crop the result.

    Great work, to both of you!

  19. #39
    Member Hamish McHaggis's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 May 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thanks Rick, I'll have a try in photoshop to fix the horizon,
    Colin

  20. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    28 May 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here's one that I took in December at Shelly Beach near Port Macquarie. By good luck rather than good judgement it has most of the properties. The one thing that was missing is the rule of thirds. I've gone and cropped the photo so that the horizon is sitting on the 1/3 line and the sun rise is 1/3 in from the left. In this instance I'm not sure if I prefer the original or the 1/3 pic. By cropping you lose a line of clouds which I like. Here are both.

    The original

    sunrise original small.jpg

    With Rule of Thirds

    sunrise 3rd small.jpg


    Camera: Nikon D60
    Exposure: 0.005 sec (1/200)
    Aperture: f/13.0
    Focal Length: 55 mm
    Focal Length: 55.0 mm
    ISO Speed: 100
    Thanks for looking

    If you'd like to see more I'm on Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/34313408@N05/

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •