Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Viewing images.

  1. #1
    Site Rules Breach - Permanent Ban
    Join Date
    25 Jul 2006
    Location
    Pordenone, Italy
    Posts
    21

    Viewing images.

    This minor problem has been bugging me for a while, I use CS3 to process my images and always sharpen as a final step. They look great in CS but when viewong them in Windows they look less sharp. I have no idea why this happens, I know they are sharp in print, when I send files to magazines and when I post them on the web. Windows file viewer seems to be the problem. Any ideas?

  2. #2
    Antipod jev's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Apr 2008
    Location
    Amersfoort, NL
    Posts
    458
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton View Post
    They look great in CS but when viewong them in Windows they look less sharp.
    <snip>
    Any ideas?
    Now, this sounds stupid, I know, but euhm... don't use the Windows viewer to check sharpness with? Chances are you're not looking at 100%, but resized. Resizing always is a tradeoff between quality and performance, thus PS might do it one way and Windows Viewer might do it another way.

    If you are pixelpeeping at 100%, chances are the windows viewer doesn't use color profiles. That in itself isn't causing unsharpness, but due to the different meaning of the colors in your image, it might give the visual impression of unsharpness. Quite a technical story I'm afraid, but suffices to say it can happen.

    Printing is a completely different story ofcourse. If you want tack-sharp prints, it's even best to oversharpen a bit.
    Ciao, Joost

    All feedback is highly appreciated!

  3. #3
    Site Rules Breach - Permanent Ban
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    25 Jul 2006
    Location
    Pordenone, Italy
    Posts
    21
    Jev thanks very much for that explanation.....I use Windows viewer as a quick way to look at and show images to others.....also noticed that on a friends Mac there is no difference between CS and the image viewer on Mac. I wish I had seen your response today before I went and ordered two large prints, the files were sharp in CS but perhaps I should have oversharpened, I will know when I pick them up lol.

  4. #4
    Moderately Underexposed I @ M's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 May 2007
    Location
    Marlo, Far East Gippsland
    Posts
    4,354
    The basic Windows viewer has, to me at least, never produced a good rendition of any picture whether it be one of mine or someone else's that has been sent to me.
    I also noted in another post a while ago that the current version of the free Nikon software, View NX, seems to also apply a soft look to photos both pre and post PP whereas the previous version used to give a reliable guide to how they looked pre PP or post PP.
    It seems to be a matter of the sizing generated for viewing as a trade off for speed in opening the file.
    Andrew
    Nikon, Fuji, Nikkor, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina and too many other bits and pieces to list.



  5. #5
    It's all about the Light!
    Tech Admin
    Kym's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury, Adelaide
    Posts
    8,901
    Colour space?
    You need to publish as sRGB for things to look the same. Not all browsers or viewers honour the colour profile information. sRGB is the PC default.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •