User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: SATA 1/2/3 Differences?

  1. #1
    Ausphotography Regular wideangle's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Sep 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    1,460
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    SATA 1/2/3 Differences?

    Looking at getting a new HDD and want to know if SATA 2 AND 3 plug into SATA 1? I have SATA1 at the moment, so are they all backwards compatible? I was assuming they were and the later models just have more speed? Lookin at the SATA2 models.
    please ask before PP my images

    "Life is what happens to you while your busy making other plans"

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    07 Aug 2007
    Location
    Newcastle, NSW
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If your board only has an onboard SATA One controller newer drives will work but at a reduced performance level.

  3. #3
    It's all about the Light!
    Tech Admin
    Kym's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury, Adelaide
    Posts
    9,632
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    OF is correct.
    Gory details here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SATA

  4. #4
    can't remember Tannin's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Huon Valley
    Posts
    4,122
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As usual, the two old farts are correct. Note, however, that the reduced performance level is more theoretical than real, for two reasons. First, the key performance metric for hard drives isn't data transfer rate, it's average access time, which is completely unrelated to your conection (IDE, SATA 1, SATA 2, SCSI, or Kalafudgian). Second, theoretical data rates provided y the interface (SATA in your case) are always way, way higher than the actual internal data rate the drive is capable of. This happens because the drives themselves are electro-mechanical and quite difficult to make faster (read expensive, wait a few more years while they figure the next advance out), while the interfaces are purely electronic and relatively easy to change. So the actual data rate a state-of-the-art drive can deliver lags a long way behind the theoretical data transfer rate the SATA interface can handle, typically by about 5 years or so.

    In short: it doesn't matter which one you get.
    Tony

    It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    07 Aug 2007
    Location
    Newcastle, NSW
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kym View Post
    OF is correct.
    If I pass you on my wife's email address feel free to tell her of this miracle

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Jun 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by oldfart View Post
    If I pass you on my wife's email address feel free to tell her of this miracle
    She is still unlikely to believe it....she may think you spoofed someones addy

    Thanks for the info all..I too am getting ready to build a new system and haven't kept up to date with whats out there. Not that it matters anyway since what's new today is old tomorrow.
    Nikon D80•MB-D80•Nikkor AF-S 70-300 f/4.5-5.6 IF-ED VR•Nikkor 28-200 f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED•Nikkor 18-55 f/3.5-5.6G AF•Nikkor 55-200 f/4-5.6G AF•Nikkor 50 f1.8•Speedlite SB800
    Nikon FM-3
    Canon AV-1 | Canon Eos Elan
    Olympus C-740



  7. #7
    Ausphotography Regular
    Threadstarter
    wideangle's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Sep 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    1,460
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for your help everyone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •