User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Lighting for a close up?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Sep 2006
    Location
    **Suburb/Town Required**
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Lighting for a close up?

    Have a look at this:

    http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/...ps+sort%3Atime

    How would you get the shadowless background and the well lit hand? Foam core board as back drop with a light source coming from behind it and a few lights in front?
    My Special K....10D
    My dA Gallery


  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    09 Aug 2006
    Location
    Puerto Tierra
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up

    Reckon it might be one of those x-ray viewing lightboxes.
    I'm after one atm for some macro's of sliced fruit, just missed one on ebay for $90
    Might make one instead, i have opaque perspex here.
    "If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough." - legendary war photographer Robert Capa.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Jun 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with Dowden on this or it could very well be a light box.
    Nikon D80•MB-D80•Nikkor AF-S 70-300 f/4.5-5.6 IF-ED VR•Nikkor 28-200 f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED•Nikkor 18-55 f/3.5-5.6G AF•Nikkor 55-200 f/4-5.6G AF•Nikkor 50 f1.8•Speedlite SB800
    Nikon FM-3
    Canon AV-1 | Canon Eos Elan
    Olympus C-740



  4. #4
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    7,701
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm thinking PS trickery??

    I dunno how (I'm a PS dunce!) ... the outline looks weird to me.... not very natural looking?

    there doesn't appear to be any depth at all???

    Something weird about it... I reckon PS!
    Nikon D800E, D300, D70s
    {Nikon} -> 50/1.2 : 500/8(CPU'd) : 105/2.8VR Micro : 180/2.8ais : 105mm f/1.8ais : 24mm/2ais
    {Sigma}; ->10-20/4-5.6 : 50/1.4 : 12-24/4.5-5.6II : 150-600mm|S
    {Tamron}; -> 17-50/2.8 : 28-75/2.8 : 70-200/2.8 : 300/2.8 SP MF : 24-70/2.8VC


  5. #5
    foonji
    Guest
    looks very photoshopped to me aswell.

    the cut is fairly sharp and dirty around the hand.

  6. #6
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    7,701
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wasn't thinking along the lines of cut(or whatever) .... more along the lines of, flood fill or something like that??

    Although flood fill can give the illusion of a cut job....

    the background looks too stark compared to the hand, and the shadows on the fingers seem to indicate lighting from the RHS(as viewed).

    there are subtle shadows at the base of the fingers, and the thumb!

    BUT! If you want shadowless flash photography, a couple of highend flashes, etc...

    There was a link to a comparison of what flashes are capable of ... looking...looking....looking

  7. #7
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    03 Sep 2006
    Location
    **Suburb/Town Required**
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ...So would a home made light box and a couple of 100w light bulbs do the trick?

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    09 Aug 2006
    Location
    Puerto Tierra
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by K.I.A.
    ...So would a home made light box and a couple of 100w light bulbs do the trick?
    as long as heat build-up isnt an issue.
    I reckon 2x40's would suffice.

    I'm going to make one on my next 4-day break.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Aug 2006
    Location
    Lilli Pilli
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm with AK & foonji. PS deep etch for sure.
    Nikon D200
    Nikon D70
    Nikkor AF-S VR 70-200 2.8
    Nikkor 50mm 1.8
    Nikkor 18-70 kit lens
    Nikon SB800 Speedlite
    and other stuff



    I view stupidity as a virtue.....well it works for me anyway!
    Australian Photography Competitions- Have you voted yet?

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    26 Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dowden
    as long as heat build-up isnt an issue.
    I reckon 2x40's would suffice.
    I don't think 2x40w globes would provide enough light.

    I use three 25w compact flouros (125w equivalent). The added benefit is that they don't produce as much light, and it's a bit more diffused due to the shape of the globes.

    Cheers,
    Martin.

  11. #11
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    7,701
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was going to suggest fluoros too (on a hunch) mainly for the diffused output, and heat!

    Mpot just confirmed it!

    What are the light boxes to be used for?... (not really understanding studio photography much )

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    09 Aug 2006
    Location
    Puerto Tierra
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Talking

    I want a light box so i can try cross polarisation. (using 2 cp's, one on the len's, t'other "under" what you want to photograph.)
    Look's trippy, and i want to be the first to try it here so that's all the info ya's need atm.

    Plus, slices of fruit/veggies look good when shot macro style. (subject goes on light-box so light penetrates the subject matter.)
    ...or in my "mind" they do anyway.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Aug 2006
    Location
    Lilli Pilli
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good info guys..... (and I must say that fella looks a hell of alot like me!) but getting back to the original question, here's a shot I posted some time ago:



    I would say the shot in question has been dealt with in the same fashion. Here's the original:





    Once the original has been deep etched (new layer) you can edit/light it in PS any way you want leaving a pure white B/G. The image is a close up and mine is not, I have used a bigger feather than what has been used on the image in question, therefore the sharper edges. I'm sure this was the way it was done. Although I've been wrong before and will be again

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •