film cameras are selling fast

[billsstills]

I spend a lot of time searching hock shops and the internet for bargain cameras/lenses and accessories. It seems that currently there is a major exodus from anything film.
I don't know how much longer film will last but I'd bet there's still a market for it.

For me a Nikon user I can grab bargain manual focus lenses easily.

And I would suggest black and white film is still better than anything digital.


Bill.

[Kym]

I still have my 30+ year old MX. Metal gears etc. never goes wrong, just don't use it anymore.

My 2.2 cents worth (inc GST)...

Film and digital are *different* mediums. There will always be a role for film but digital is so flexible.

FYI: The web (the internet is much older, dating back to the 60') is only 15 years old (official birthday is 30th April 1993 - CERN put the http protocol in the public domain, there were 200 web servers active on that day).

We are in the middle of a revolution that will continue rapid evolution for 20+ years. What will digital photography look like in 2028? I have no idea other than it will not be like today or 10 years ago.

Film technology will not change anywhere near as much. Film will still be used in 2028 for certain purposes.

[billsstills]

the only question I'd ask Kym is "who will make the film?" then...
I hope someone does. I certainly won't leave it behind until I'm forced to. I still shoot a roll of film at a wedding even if I don't tell the client.


Being of ethnic origin "a wog" (I'm a staunch Aussie these days) I was a fan of all sports at high school except cricket.
So when cricket season started I'd spend my time with nerds playing Chess. Those Nerds were all over the computer writing programs in DOS while I asked a lot of questions.

I don't have much trouble with my Mac's or PC's in my computer dungeon these days while my wife wonders why the guy she thought was a jock knows so much about computers.

I'm not used to "WEB" I remember it being called "Internet" way back when... ... 1979


warm regard,
Bill.

[Kym]

Who will make the film... Probably Kodak, Ilford and Fuji?

I go back to 71... http://www.users.on.net/~farnik/wiki...RetroComputing

[billsstills]

I remember sending my Kodachrome 64 to Melbourne then waiting for the slides... gee that takes me back man,

Not Kodak. Maybe Fuji but Ilford is giving it a shot. We can't keep film in the fridge forever.

[jev]

Film will live, that's pretty sure. Kodak? I doubt it. Ilford, yes. And probably a couple of new players will step in like the ones that now make photographic paper.

[wongyboi]

Polaroid is still alive. The instax range revived it but the cost of film is still high. High end cameras like a Canon 1n can be bought cheaply as well as older cameras for <$100. Even rangefinders like the Canonet are cheap as chips!

[TOM]

film will be likely be made for all of our lifetimes. the motion picture industry is the major consumer.

http://motion.kodak.com/US/en/motion...Cost/index.htm

just dropped 14 rolls from last weeks wedding off at the lab today, and i'll pick the high res scan dvd and negs up next week. glad i don't have to spend 15 hours+ editing these images.

[arthurking83]

My only concern with that video clip is that it's off a Kodak website.
Since they have a major vested interest in film production compared to their minimal interests in video movie output.. I'd say it's an advertorial.

The cold hard facts(on the streets that is) is that film is dying.. and most videographers are shooting HD.. and that wil only increase as the production costs of producing film increase due to the dwindling demand for it.

From a totally left field perspective:
I used to deliver many boxes of film stock(usually the 400ft rolls in cans in boxes.. many,many boxes of the stuff, and on one occasion to a far flung corner of the state(Lorne) in an urgent manner. 20 boxes of urgently needed film to keep the production from stalling apparently, and the deliver cost them big time too!
The number of these boxes of 400ft film rolls I used to deliver to various film production companies around Melb alone... notto mention the other 60 drivers that must have delivered more(but I used to be favoured for these Kodak deliveries, as I lived around the corner form their warehouse here in Coburg.
For the last 5 years or so, since the warehouse closed down.. not a single delivery of film from the new Kodak HQ, which is closer to the CBD(in Collingwood).. ever!
They come in from Sydney in dribs and drabs, but no one really uses it any more..

That's a sign of the times(for film) when the mega city sized warehouse they used to have in Coburg(north) is now a cold store warehouse.. and I think the vast majority of the land is to be developed into housing.. must have been a good 50 to 100 acre site.. now they have a tiny little 1000sq meter office block shared with other tennants!

Personally I can't see film being a viable manufacturing proposition beyond about 20 years or so(most likely less).. the (unit)production costs will kill it.. but as someone else mentioned.. some niche player may still produce it in small quantities in a more efficient manner. It'll still be too expensive for major productions tho.

makes no real difference to me whether it stays or goes(by the wayside)... except for the issue of a reduction in work, and more importantly!!... no more express jobs to Lorne

I believe Kodak will make more money in their Aussie operation over the next few years from the sale of their warehousing site(s), than they will from film sales! The ex site in Coburg must surely be well worth over $100M in it's unimproved state(well it's improved now as the ugly old buildings have been torn down)... there's room for many hundreds of houses on prime land @ approx $400K per block.

[TOM]

My only concern with that video clip is that it's off a Kodak website.

I haven't got a problem with that. Kodak are also largely responsible for the digital craze that we are currently being subjected to. Everything that is published inagazines, or clips (like that silly one where they blow up two images and hang them from a building) are all sponsored by Digital Camera manufacturers....consumers sure aren't choosing digital for it's image rendition. Whilst film sales may be down in Lorne, in places like Japan, it enjoys a huge following.

[Krzys]

Ilford/Harman is loyal to film users and vice versa.

Whilst film sales may be down in Lorne, in places like Japan, it enjoys a huge following.

Every second Japanese person I walk by notices my Kiev. Every fifth Japanese person says "nice camera".

[nisstrust]

Yeah when i was in japan, almost everyone was shooting film, freaked me out. Good on them i thought, then after a while i realised that in Japan, everyone has a camera and loves shooting film or digital.

[wongyboi]

There is a photographer in Japan, John Sypal who runs the http://tokyocamerastyle.com/ website. Everyone in Japan shoots film!

There is our solution. Move to Japan

[Krzys]

Nice to see somebody else follows John. Valerian is a great great blog.

[wongyboi]

Nice to see somebody else follows John. Valerian is a great great blog.

Yup. He updates it regularly and in contrast to his camera site he focuses on photogaphers and art more than gear

[Krzys]

You still get a photo of a pair of Leicas ever few posts though

[wongyboi]

You still get a photo of a pair of Leicas ever few posts though

He seems to love taking pictures of his own MP lmao.

[old dog]

I still get tempted to use my pentax program A (aperture priority) and 50 f1.4 lens. Works like new.

[Krzys]

It will work like new forever

[TOM]

The m7 and mp really complement each other well. I do like the larger shutter dial of the m6 ttl/m7 which is easier to move, quicker, and more intuative. The mp is smaller and just feels a bit smoother. Also the mechanical shutter is a nice contrast to the m7's electronically controlled shutter.