User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 42

Thread: Manual Focus?

  1. #21
    Craig Miller
    Guest
    Ahh. good info thanks arthur.. I'll have a look and get back with the results!

  2. #22
    New Member
    Join Date
    20 Jun 2006
    Location
    **Suburb/Town Required**
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have recently gotten contacts....and the difference over glasses is amazing.

    If contacts are an option for your loss of sight, then give them a try.
    my eyes are out a measly -.75 (so my distance vision is a little crappy) and they work a treat.
    Word of the day
    Flickr
    http://nob.au.com
    Canon 5d, Canon 20d, Canon 30d, and a whole lotta Canon glass
    For Geeky Tshirts check out
    http://www.gtee.com.au

  3. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Jun 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah I switched to contacts last year..but mine are -4 and -3.75. So everything looks out of focus until I have it near my nose.
    Nikon D80•MB-D80•Nikkor AF-S 70-300 f/4.5-5.6 IF-ED VR•Nikkor 28-200 f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED•Nikkor 18-55 f/3.5-5.6G AF•Nikkor 55-200 f/4-5.6G AF•Nikkor 50 f1.8•Speedlite SB800
    Nikon FM-3
    Canon AV-1 | Canon Eos Elan
    Olympus C-740



  4. #24
    Craig Miller
    Guest
    Contacts are no good to me, I can't see more then 4 feet in front of me with my glasses on. I'd be putting them in and taking them out 100 times a day.

  5. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Jun 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They do make bi-focal contacts

  6. #26
    Member Beanz's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    **Suburb/Town Required**
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've just started wearing glasses for reading and comp work too, but my optician said it shouldn't affect camera work at all!?!

    I find the viewfinder on the 350d way too small, and very hard to manual focus, so i usually just go with auto.. Unfortunately i think the cheaper lenses, like the kit lens, aren't too accurate on focussing!?!

    Let us know how you get on with the extender, that might be a good option for me too.
    Scott

    Canon 350D, 18-55mm, 50mm 1.8.

  7. #27
    Craig Miller
    Guest
    We'll see soon enough Beanzy.. I'll be ordering my Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 in the next week or two!

  8. #28
    New Member
    Join Date
    20 Jun 2006
    Location
    **Suburb/Town Required**
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ronbo
    They do make bi-focal contacts
    really?? that would make working on the compy a whole lot nicer

  9. #29
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    8,777
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Craigus
    ........
    I just find it difficult get get right. All other SLR's I have used in the past have the same split prism focus system and I never had any problems. ......
    Yeah I love those split prism viewfinders...for ease of use/accuracy.

    I'm going to get one of KatzEye Split Prism replacement

    Hope it does the job and the "blackout" problem isn't too bad!
    Nikon D800E, D300, D70s
    {Nikon}; -> 50/1.2 : 500/8 : 105/2.8VR Micro : 180/2.8 ais : 105mm f/1.8 ais : 24mm/2 ais
    {Sigma}; ->10-20/4-5.6 : 50/1.4 : 12-24/4.5-5.6II : 150-600mm|S
    {Tamron}; -> 17-50/2.8 : 28-75/2.8 : 70-200/2.8 : 300/2.8 SP MF : 24-70/2.8VC

    {Yongnuo}; -> YN35/2N : YN50/1.8N


  10. #30
    Craig Miller
    Guest
    Fwor.. $100 US?

    Let me know how effective it is and I might just get myself one too.

    Thanks for shaing!

  11. #31
    mrmclarge
    Guest

    MF Verse AF

    Quote Originally Posted by Craigus View Post
    I've thought about that but I only NEED my glasses to see the computer screen/books. I'm not sure I need them for the camera as my distance vision is near enough to perfect. Maybe I just need more practice!
    When I am shooting macro, I always use MF but you are right it becomes a little hard on the eyes and quite often it is hit and miss. I make sure the eye piece is in focus and then when I get the photo in focus or near it, I push the MF button and then it pulls the focus right in. Your camera may not have that.

  12. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    14 Aug 2006
    Location
    Sanctuary Point - 2 hours south of Sydney
    Posts
    237
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Craigus View Post
    Yes it has the viewfinder adjustment.

    I just find it difficult get get right. All other SLR's I have used in the past have the same split prism focus system and I never had any problems. (though I didn't wear glasses then)

    I have bought the extender so I'll see how things go when it turnes up.
    try adjusting the dioptric adjustment without glasses.
    Brian

    My two pet hates are male chauvanists and women who won't do as they are told

    Canon 60D - Canon 17-40mm f4 L USM - Canon 70 - 200mm F4 L IS USM - CANON 24-105MM f4 IS USM - Sigma EF-500 DG Super Flash - Lightroom 4.4 - Photo Elements 11 ****

  13. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    10 Oct 2006
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    34
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wear glasses, I find my main problem is when i press the damn camera against them and get smudges all over my lens (glasses) so then EVERYTHING is OOF!!

    I should try contacts, but I really don't like the feel of them lol

  14. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Jun 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Try soft contacts SSSchwing. I used to wear hard..didn't like em. Went to soft and once in didn't feel them at all.

  15. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    10 Oct 2006
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    34
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm not sure what the ones I tried were to be honest...

    I might go back and speak with the Optom....see what they can do...although, I'm so used to my glasses these days, I think i look weird without them! LOL

    Thanks Ronbo

  16. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    29 Sep 2006
    Location
    Perth Baldivis
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Craigus View Post
    Ohh. I found this on the Canon site: Eyepiece Extender EP-EX15

    For the bargin price of $35 from EBAY I think I might give one a try.
    Hi there everyone.

    The extender according to what I was told will make no difference it is the optic or dioptric that wont focus down for enough on the Canon I have the same problem, Brian let me know if it does make any difference if it does I will buy one right away.

    Pat.
    A photograph is only as good as the eyes that look at it


    Camera.s fuji S7000
    Canon 350d
    Kit len's
    Canon 100mm F/2.8 Macro.
    Canon 28-135 F/3.5-5.6 IS

    If my pic isn't in the comments & crit section, please don't edit.

  17. #37
    Craig Miller
    Guest
    It makes the damn viewfinder even SMALLER! I'm an idiot! Didn't read the description properly.

  18. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    14 Aug 2006
    Location
    Sanctuary Point - 2 hours south of Sydney
    Posts
    237
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bygum View Post
    Hi there everyone.

    The extender according to what I was told will make no difference it is the optic or dioptric that wont focus down for enough on the Canon I have the same problem, Brian let me know if it does make any difference if it does I will buy one right away.

    Pat.
    I don't have the extender. My suggestion was in realtion to the dioptic adjustment to see if it would be better without wearing glasses. The extender keeps the camera a bit further away from the face so that you your nose is not pressing against the LCD screen. I wear glasses and as such my nose only just touches the LCD screen. I suppose Bill Lawry would benefit from an extender

  19. #39
    New Member Fez's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Oct 2006
    Location
    Melbourne.
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    After reading comments on p1 I was going to post something intelligent, then I read p2 and have totally forgotton what I was going to say. You guys are great
    Fez (AKA Dave)


  20. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    18 Jun 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    83
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Lol I know what you mean Fez. I came into this thread, began reading...was about to reply..then forgot...then remembered by page 3...and then realised this thread is 6 months old and what I had to say was no longer relevant
    -My Gear:
    Nikon D600 -/- Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 -/- Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR -/- Nikon SB800 -/- and a bunch of accessories

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •