User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  4
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Cheap s/hand Canon EFS 60mm macro

  1. #1
    Former Username : Wetpixels
    Join Date
    08 May 2013
    Location
    South East Queensland
    Posts
    3,854
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cheap s/hand Canon EFS 60mm macro

    I have always enjoyed playing around with macro, and usually use extension rings, and sometimes close-up filters. However, today I wandered into a secondhand store and, as usual, looked in the camera cabinet. There sat a Canon EFS 60mm Ultrasonic Macro lens for under half price. I asked to look at it, and found out that it had "a small dust mark". Other than that, it looked like new and had a cheap Skylight filter on it as well. I asked for their best price, and got some further dollars off, so I succumbed and bought it. Everything except the dust spot covered under warranty.

    I figured if the dust mark annoyed me too much I would maybe get it cleaned, or attempt a clean myself. Turns out the mark is off to the side on the left, and not too annoying at all. The lens is a pleasure to use, and very quick enough to autofocus. Here's a quick oof snap to show the spot (ignore the slight vignetting, that's because of light when I took the photo).

    IMG_5688.jpg
    80D, 600D, EFS 60mm Macro, Sigma 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM Lens - Contemporary, Sigma 18-250mm 1:3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM lens, EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS STM lens, EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS II lens, EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II lens, Yongnuo YN500EX flash, Velbon Sherpa 5370D tripod, PH-157Q head, Klika W1003 monopod, AF Macro Extension tubes, LED Ringflash Software: Darktable, Gimp, DigiKam

  2. #2
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    17 Dec 2008
    Location
    Willowbank
    Posts
    1,304
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That looks like sensor dust, have you tried a different lens?
    Regards
    John
    Nikon D750, Sigma 105mm OS Macro, Tokina 16-28 F2.8, Sigma 24-105 Art, Sigma 150-600C,
    Benro Tripod and Monopod with Arca plates


  3. #3
    Ausphotography irregular Mark L's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Nov 2010
    Location
    magical Mudgee
    Posts
    21,586
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Don't Canon have a dust delete data thing that can remove this spot when taking the photo? Might have to go with a custom setting in the camera when using this particular lens?

  4. #4
    Former Username : Wetpixels
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    08 May 2013
    Location
    South East Queensland
    Posts
    3,854
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by J.davis View Post
    That looks like sensor dust, have you tried a different lens?
    Yes of course, and there is no mark there with the different lens. Remember, the guy that tests the lenses in the store said it had a dust mark, so he saw it too, on a different camera

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark L View Post
    Don't Canon have a dust delete data thing that can remove this spot when taking the photo? Might have to go with a custom setting in the camera when using this particular lens?
    Interesting, I'll look into that. Meanwhile, if it shows up in anything picture I take, Darktable has a super easy spot removal tool. It isn't likely to be a problem, as it is over on the side, and mostly gets cropped out.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Dazz1 View Post

    Interesting, I'll look into that. Meanwhile, if it shows up in anything picture I take, Darktable has a super easy spot removal tool. It isn't likely to be a problem, as it is over on the side, and mostly gets cropped out.
    Found it. It's data captured from a white oof sample shot, that is used in PP to remove the dust spot automatically in DPP. Makes it slightly easier to do than in Darktable manually.

  5. #5
    can't remember Tannin's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Huon Valley
    Posts
    4,122
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nice choice. The EF-S 60mm macro is a delightful lens. It's a little short for macro (most prefer something in the 90mm class) but certainly very usable, and sharp as you like. As a bonus, it's an excellent general purpose mild telephoto for landscapes and portraits. You will probably miss having IS, but it's a great lens nevertheless. Enjoy!
    Tony

    It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.

  6. #6
    Former Username : Wetpixels
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    08 May 2013
    Location
    South East Queensland
    Posts
    3,854
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tannin View Post
    Nice choice. The EF-S 60mm macro is a delightful lens. It's a little short for macro (most prefer something in the 90mm class) but certainly very usable, and sharp as you like. As a bonus, it's an excellent general purpose mild telephoto for landscapes and portraits. You will probably miss having IS, but it's a great lens nevertheless. Enjoy!
    Thanks. I am just starting to explore it's possibilites I feel. I never thought about the stabilisation. You are right, it does not have any. I read somewhere that adding some rings lets it do some extreme macro, so I have to try that.

  7. #7
    Loves The Wildlife. Mary Anne's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Dec 2009
    Location
    Brisbane Southside.
    Posts
    45,967
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don’t know if you need IS on that lens Dazz I don’t have any on my Tamron 90 mm because they are a light lenses Tamron weighs 405 gms your 60 mm canon is a lighter lens it’s weighs 335 gms

    I shoot with Olympus Cameras.. Sometimes Canon and My iPhone SE 2020




  8. #8
    Former Username : Wetpixels
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    08 May 2013
    Location
    South East Queensland
    Posts
    3,854
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mary Anne View Post
    Don’t know if you need IS on that lens Dazz I don’t have any on my Tamron 90 mm because they are a light lenses Tamron weighs 405 gms your 60 mm canon is a lighter lens it’s weighs 335 gms

    You are correct, it is VERY light. I am finding it easy to hold it steady.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •