User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  3
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Why is macro small?

  1. #1
    Account Closed Ilovebokeh's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Sep 2017
    Location
    perth
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Why is macro small?

    Hi,

    Pardon the silly question but why is macro photography microscopic close up?

    I thought macro was 'the big picture view'

    Eg macro -economics. Why isn't insect photography micro instead of macro?

  2. #2
    can't remember Tannin's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Huon Valley
    Posts
    4,122
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's called "macro" because a macro lens makes the image on your sensor big. It is normal to define a macro lens as one which is capable of creating an image on your sensor as large as or larger than the subject - i.e., 100% magnification or better. Watchout for low-rent lens makers who think a macro lens is anything at all if they write "macro" on the box. It isn't.

    (Arthur will be along in a minute to explain that Nikon call macro micro.)
    Tony

    It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.

  3. #3
    Way Down Yonder in the Paw Paw Patch jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jun 2007
    Location
    Loei
    Posts
    3,565
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well, insect photography is micro in Nikon's terminology (though referred to as macro generally) You may also hear that macro means photos where the subject appears at life size (1:1) or greater, while micro ought to mean significantly greater magnification, but in practice the words just aren't used consistently. The terminology is essentially arbitrary. Macro really means big and micro means small. Thus micro photography means photographing very small things, and macro photography means making small things look big.

    You just have to put up with it, I'm afraid.

  4. #4
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    8,777
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tannin View Post
    ....(Arthur will be along in a minute to explain that Nikon call macro micro.)
    no I won't .. it's a silly situation that needs to be ignored, all blown up "to tiny bits" ... and a new start made to sort things out properly.


    Quote Originally Posted by Tannin View Post
    .... Watchout for low-rent lens makers who think a macro lens is anything at all if they write "macro" on the box. It isn't.
    ....
    I only entered this thread to +1 that comment.


    In saying that tho .. I think the OP answered his own question as to why Nikon call it micro and not macro.

    The Wiki explains it well, and why Nikon is correct and all other's not!
    Because of one sly lens maker(this Kilfitt mob) the world of close up photography was changed forever! .. and everyone else sheepishly followed the party line!

    Needless to say, if you see a Nikon(branded, not fitment) lens and it says Macro in it's name, it ain't going to be low-rent, or cheap .. in fact you may have to sell your house to afford some.
    Nikon D800E, D300, D70s
    {Nikon}; -> 50/1.2 : 500/8 : 105/2.8VR Micro : 180/2.8 ais : 105mm f/1.8 ais : 24mm/2 ais
    {Sigma}; ->10-20/4-5.6 : 50/1.4 : 12-24/4.5-5.6II : 150-600mm|S
    {Tamron}; -> 17-50/2.8 : 28-75/2.8 : 70-200/2.8 : 300/2.8 SP MF : 24-70/2.8VC

    {Yongnuo}; -> YN35/2N : YN50/1.8N


  5. #5
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    27 Mar 2014
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,173
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So are they macro lenses, for micro photography?!
    Gear: Panasonic Lumix FZ200 / Huawei Mate 20 / LR 5, PSE 12, Da Vinci resolve

    "I may be crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."

  6. #6
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    8,777
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by landyvlad View Post
    So are they macro lenses, for micro photography?!
    Dunno .. depends on your point of view.
    But being anti everything .. I'd say they're 'micro lenses for macro photography'

  7. #7
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    18 May 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cos it's macro-fying the micro world
    Nikon FX + m43
    davophoto.wordpress.com

  8. #8
    Ausphotography Addict martycon's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Dec 2009
    Location
    Townsville
    Posts
    10,826
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for asking the question. The answers and points of view are interesting. I have always understood that kangaroos were dubbed "macropod" as having big feet, but never considered that in relation th the photographic use of the word. Our language seldom has prcise meanings, except in a mathematical or scientific sense.
    cheers marty.

  9. #9
    Arch-Σigmoid Ausphotography Regular ameerat42's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Sep 2009
    Location
    Nthn Sydney
    Posts
    23,523
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ilovebokeh View Post
    ...

    Eg macro -economics. Why isn't insect photography micro instead of macro?
    Fair Q.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tannin View Post
    It's called "macro" because a macro lens makes the image on your sensor big. It is normal to define a macro lens as one which is capable of creating an image on your sensor as large as or larger than the subject - i.e., 100% magnification or better. Watchout for low-rent lens makers who think a macro lens is anything at all if they write "macro" on the box. It isn't.
    My answer was a paraphrase of Tannins: that it enLARGEs the scale of image reproduction.

    Quote Originally Posted by jim View Post
    Well, insect photography is micro in Nikon's terminology (though referred to as macro generally)...[/I]
    Which shows that Nikon is just plain wrng!

    Quote Originally Posted by jim View Post
    ...You just have to put up with it, I'm afraid...
    If you follow Nikon

    Quote Originally Posted by swifty View Post
    Cos it's macro-fying the micro world
    More-or-less.
    CC, Image editing OK.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •