http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ld-camera.html
Stunning photos, but I wonder how much post processing was involved. I also wonder what gear he used?
 |
  |
 |
Thanks useful information: 6
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ld-camera.html
Stunning photos, but I wonder how much post processing was involved. I also wonder what gear he used?
Pentax K3, K100D Super, Sigma 18-50, Takamur-A 28-80, Pentax DA 50-200, Sicor 80-200, Tamron 2X teleconverter
Well, still the work of taking the photo had the biggest challenge.
Regards.
J. Arguello.
Constructive Criticism (CC) is alsways welcome.
Photography gear: Nikon D7000; Tokina 11-20mm f/2.8; Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5 - 5.6; Tamron A17 70-300mm f/4 - 5.6; Nikkor 50mm f/1.8; Yongnuo 35mm f/2; Neewer 85mm f/1.8; Nikon AW100 ;Canon EOS 300; Tamron 28-105mm; Canon 75-300mm.
Photo Editing: Nikon Capture NX-D , GIMP ;
Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/arguelloflores/
Impressive but I hate them. He's somehow managed to make real machines look like bad paintings.
Sorry Jim, but I disagree. These are sensational. The lighting, the focus and depth of field are all just so well done. And, it looks like he is shooting with a Canon DSLR http://planepicture.com/about-us .
He has some photos that you can download for screensavers for the aviation fans out there.
Andrew
No need to be sorry, Hawthy, we all like different things. And I completely agree with you about the technical brilliance shown here.
Originally Posted by jim
I know what you mean, for me it seems like he's made it look like a studio setting, which has taken away the romanticism and mood of flight. They're lacking in emotion for me because of this, although I like the detail from an academic point of view.
My Flickr Site
Instagram _alex_ham_
Gear - Canon 5D mkIII, 16-35 f2.8L, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4L IS, nifty 50, 75-300 f4-5.6. Sigma SD Quattro H, Sigma 35 mm Art, Sigma 85 mm Art, Canon G1X MkII, Panasonic Lumix DMC LX3, iPhone.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Add To Bookmarks
