Originally Posted by
Lance B
Yes, a ridiculous broadbrush idea to charge anyone with a tripod a fee to take a photo. If I am at Barangaroo at midday and take a photo, I don't need a tripod due to plenty of light, yet if I decide to take late evening or early morning shot with low light and therefore require a tripod that somehow I suddenly become a commercial photog and need a license fee? How ludicrous. Same camera, same photographer same place yet the rules change? Could only have been a bureaucrat that thought this little gem up.