$300M is going to buy some really good lawyers.
http://priceonomics.com/the-richest-...-in-the-world/
$300M is going to buy some really good lawyers.
http://priceonomics.com/the-richest-...-in-the-world/
I like Missy Suicide's response. Maybe photographers should start doing that with all his "art". The problem is, he's already achieved the position of someone whose "art" people are willing to pay silly money for. I love how people will pay large sums for something if a contemporary societal commentary is given as the reason for the art. Mind you, I've long held the belief that photographers make up far more interesting stories around their pictures than was the reality.
My Flickr Site
Instagram _alex_ham_
Gear - Canon 5D mkIII, 16-35 f2.8L, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4L IS, nifty 50, 75-300 f4-5.6. Sigma SD Quattro H, Sigma 35 mm Art, Sigma 85 mm Art, Canon G1X MkII, Panasonic Lumix DMC LX3, iPhone.
Wow that article is unbelievable.
I reckon he's onto something that we can all do....lol. I'd be down at his gallery every day with my Android phone snapping "his" art for myself.
Except he probably bans cameras into his exhibitions
Last edited by Cricket; 09-12-2015 at 1:29pm.
No mater what, he is still a non-entity. (Other epithets like "piece of dirt" and many more spring to mind.)
His followers/clients/suckers are mindless indiscriminants.
Nuff's head.
CC, Image editing OK.
He's not a photog.
Very interesting article.
Copyright. You only have the 'right' if your pockets are deep enough to defend them, otherwise you have nothing.
Last edited by jjphoto; 10-12-2015 at 7:34am.
Tend to agree. If I was the artists he was stealing from, I would be more than just a little annoyed.
I'd take a photo of his photo and include a hand with the middle finger raised.