 |
  |
 |
Thanks useful information: 2
So I know that compensation on the flash has an effect independent from the camera.
Question is, if I use ETTL and exposure compensation in camera, does the flash adjust and make my in camera compensation worthless, as the flash will try and adjust what the camera is doing?
"Enjoy what you can do rather than being frustrated at what you can't." bobt
Canon 80D, 60D, Canon 28-105, Sigma 150-600S.
Can i ring a friend?
www.kjbphotography.com.au
1DxII, EOS R, 200-400 f4L Ext, 100-400 f4.5-5.6L II, 70-200 F4IS, 24-70 F2.8 II, 16-35 F4IS
I think, this is probably the most confusing aspect of flash photography.
What makes it harder is that Nikon and Canon do it differently.
I think Neil Van Niekerk will explain it better...
http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-pho...-compensation/
“Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst" – Henri Cartier-Bresson
**Commercial Link Removed by Admin**
On Nikon (may be different to Canon), on my camera, the primary adjustment seems to be the ISO with iTTL but if I add exposure compensation, the flash increases and the ISO adjusts to meet the new requirements.
That said, I have found that different flashes in Nikon work differently (my SB600 vs SB700) as my SB700 cares which metering mode I am using and switches between BL-ITTL and ITTL while the SB600 doesn't so it could also come down to the flashes themselves for some of these issues.
Threadstarter
Originally Posted by Brian500au
As long as they can add something. Though I reckon you don't need that friend Brian. Or am I I missing something that's obvious?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Add To Bookmarks
