User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  3
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II or Sigma 10-20mm f/.3.5?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 19-03-2014, 6:56pm #1
    seastorm
    seastorm is offline
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    11 Aug 2009
    Location
    Poith
    Posts
    844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II or Sigma 10-20mm f/.3.5?

    For the life of me, I can't work out which one to get. Predominantly for star trails and landscapes. I know the Tokina DX II's main improvement is the autofocus motor in the lens, but I've got a D7100, so it doesn't really matter.

    The Sigma is cheaper and has a bigger range than the Tokina, but I like the speed of the Tokina, especially for star trails.

    I'm also eyeballing the Rokinon / Samyang 14mm f/2.8, but it's fixed to 14mm, and you can't use a screw on filter - the lens bulges out like a squeezed cane toad's.

    Any suggestions most welcome.
    Last edited by seastorm; 19-03-2014 at 6:57pm.
    AKA Andrew P.
    Gear: Nikon D7100, Nikon D90, Nikon 18-105mm VR, Nikon 70-300mm VR, Sigma 150-500mm APO DG OS, , Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM, Tamron 90mm Macro Di, SB400 speedlight, SB700 speedlight, Nikon DR-6, Panasonic FH20, and all sorts of stuff
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Add To BookmarksAdd To Bookmarks
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules