There is a great read and pic on page 7 of the above...![]()
Cheers Rev.
There is a great read and pic on page 7 of the above...![]()
Cheers Rev.
Or at least tell us what "the above" means
(Heavens?)
CC, Image editing OK.
I meant the topic of interest.
Libs angle for a catch as fisher fury grows..
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation
Cheers Rev.
Ta Rev, unfortunately that article is behind a paywall and I can't view it.
I am not about to pay to subscribe to an online newspaper or make the 35 klm round trip to buy the printed version so I will have to wait till the ABC put it online.
It appears to be an article, somewhat one sided in its reporting, anti marine national parks
perhaps summarised by these 2 pars.
" "There hasn't been consultation or a science-based process," Mr Hunt said. "What could and should have been a very collaborative process has been one that's aimed at the parliamentary Greens. That's my judgment."
Mr Burke said last night that "when Greg Hunt says no science and no consultation, what he really means is that he wants no conservation". "
"It is one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it is another thing to make a portrait of who they are" - Paul Caponigro
Constructive Critique of my photographs is always appreciated
Nikon, etc!
RICK
My Photography
That was the whole idea...to show the other side rather than Jessica Earwigs GREEN version..I am not against MP, as I was on the 12 person committee that formed up the state gov Capes MP. The Fed one was done with no committee and no local input from the areas where they are going. Some were made up with a stroke of Tony Burkes GREEN pen, and weren't to be questioned. So as you might have gathered , I am a fisherman concerned about conservation, but not when it's done badly.
Cheers Rev.
Based on some of Tony Burke's decisions in the last 6 months, I'm not sure he's that green.
'spose he's greener than Greg Hunt though.