User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Advice Please. 70-200 lens for K5

  1. #1
    Member Blueheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Oct 2012
    Location
    North Warrandyte
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Advice Please. 70-200 lens for K5

    Folks,

    I'm considering upgrading my long lens to a new 70-200. My two best options at the moment are the Sigma 2.8 APO EX DG OS HS and the Tamron
    SP AF f/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro. These match my criteria of being long enough and fast enough for portrait work to action shots. I already have the 10-70 range covered with a couple other pieces of glass and can't really see a need to go longer than 200. The K5 has an APS-C chip anyway so it's an effective range of 320 or thereabouts.

    Does anyone have any experience of either or both of these?

    Also, I note the Sigma has inbuilt image stabilisation which the Tamron does not. My K5 already has on board shake reduction (
    which gives me satisfactory results) and I understand that one does not use both body and lens stabilisation simultaneously.

    Any thoughts on the Sigma OS stabilisation being superior/inferior to the K5 on board stabilisation?

    Any other comparative thoughts between the two?

    The Sigma is about AUD$450 more than the Tamron so is it $450 optically better, or is that just the price of in-lens stabilisation.

    Any comments appreciated.

    Thanks

    Ray

  2. #2
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    8,185
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've had good experience with the Tammy lens.
    Had it for about 4 years now and it's performed admirably considering the price.

    I suppose the difference between in camera IS and in lens IS is that when you choose in lens IS, you not only get the stabilisation for the actual exposure, the view through the finder is also stabilized too, so that it's not such a shaky experience.

    I'd recommend that you go with the Tammy, simply because of the image quality that the Tammy can achieve.
    Nikon D800E, D300, D70s
    {Nikon} -> 50/1.2 : 500/8(CPU'd) : 105/2.8VR Micro : 180/2.8ais : 105mm f/1.8ais : 24mm/2ais
    {Sigma}; ->10-20/4-5.6 : 50/1.4 : 12-24/4.5-5.6II : 150-600mm|S
    {Tamron}; -> 17-50/2.8 : 28-75/2.8 : 70-200/2.8 : 300/2.8 SP MF : 24-70/2.8VC


  3. #3
    It's all about the Light!
    Tech Admin
    Kym's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury, Adelaide
    Posts
    9,641
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Both are good options.
    In lens stabilisation means a more stable viewfinder image but less battery life.
    The Tamron is best value.
    regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
    Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff



  4. #4
    Still in the Circle of Confusion Cage's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 May 2010
    Location
    Hunter Valley
    Posts
    5,350
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the original Sigma 70-200 f2.8 APO EX and it was as sharp as on my now gone K5.
    Cheers
    Kev

    D600 : D7200 and too much stuff to list

  5. #5
    Ausphotography Regular olefella's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Jul 2009
    Location
    Tolga NQ
    Posts
    728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    + 1 for the tamron, i find it very good for sport ie bikes.
    a granddad and enjoying every minute of it.
    C&C welcome
    -------------------------
    Donovan

  6. #6
    Member KevPride's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury North
    Posts
    498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bonus with the tammy is the excellent tamron 1.4 TC - would seem a perfect fit if you wanted longer length without much IQ loss.
    Regards
    Kevin

    Pentax K3, Pentax Tamron Sigma short glass
    Nikon D500. nikkor 200-500 f5.6.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevpride/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •