 |
  |
 |
Thanks useful information: 0
ISO 25600
truck_25600.jpg
ISO 51200
smudge_51200.jpg
It can go higher as well!! I am amazed at how 'useable' these images are. True there was some ambient light and that may make a reasonable difference but imagine the possibilities in a wedding reception type environment. Shot in AV mode at f2.8 with a 70 - 200. ISO on auto.
That just makes me cry.Any PP at all other than web size reduction?
Threadstarter
yep - noise reduction in ACR, sharpen in ACR, crop on both images. Slight curves on the cat and sharpen both in CS5.
No noise reduction set in camera. I have not tried it yet but from what I read the in camera NR is pretty good if you are pumping out JPEG. I shoot only in RAW so I turned it off.
x2Originally Posted by norwest
That just makes me cry.
Last edited by MattNQ; 11-09-2012 at 11:09am.
They look very good at the high ISO, but could be a stupid question, any flash used at at all in the pics?
sob, ExIf, sob, data, sob, says, sob, no, sob. Crying x 3.
Thanks Mark, I got an error when trying to view the EXIF data.
looks like a shite load of noise reduction on 1st shot
looks cartoony now
Threadstarter
ROFL, yep that noise reduction filter shrunk the big truck
Have included SOOC shots. Simply resized for JPEG.
25600
51200
As expected, the 51200 image is pretty horrid, but that's some impressive performance at 25600!
Please don't hesitate to provide me with CC! I'd love to hear your thoughts regarding any of my images. Thanks!
Nah, that noise is ok, just turn it B&W and call it "artistic"As expected, the 51200 image is pretty horrid, but that's some impressive performance at 25600!
Greg Bartle,
I have a Pentax and I'm not afraid to use it.
Pentax K5
Sigma 10-20 | Tamron 17-50 F:2.8 | Sigma 50 F:1.4 | Sigma 70-200 F:2.8 Plus a bunch of Ye Olde lenses
Would you like to see more?
http://flickr.com/photosbygreg
Seriously impressive performance Fess.You now have no excuses for any botched low light shots.
Horrid ???? I only have to look back 5 or 6 years and remember taking photos like that with a D200 Nikon and thinking that they were a bit rough around the edges and then consoling myself by saying " what do you expect when you push them to 800 ISO".As expected, the 51200 image is pretty horrid, but that's some impressive performance at 25600!
Been there, done that a few times.
AndrewNikon, Fuji, Nikkor, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina and too many other bits and pieces to list.
I'm not saying that getting to ISO 51200 before experiencing noise like isn't impressive, just that the noise itself is horrid
I too remember the low light performance of my first DSLR (Nikon D70), and I'm thankful for what I've got today in my K-5, which is astouding for an APS-C camera.
having come from a k10 (ISO 400 useable) to the K5 (ISO 3200 very useable) it's astounding just how far we've come in such a short time.
nice.
1DIII, 5DII, 15mm fish, 24mm ts-e, 35L,135L,200L,400L,mpe-65mm
Film: eos 300, pentax 6x7
haha oh god, I used to dread the K10D at anything above 400!
Commercial/Editorial/Wedding work - www.jackietranphoto.com
Travel Photography - www.wanderingasianguy.com
Broncolor lights up my world.
Shoot!!!!
Cheers Brian.
Canon 7D Kit lenses EFS 18-55 IS EFS 55-250 IS EF28-90 Canon EF 2xll Extender Sigma DG150-500 OS Speedlight 420EX. 580EX
Ahhhhhhh........ *drool*
Not a big fan of the NR on the truck image, but yeah it is pretty impressive.
Yeh, see that's where I go really wrong, I don't do PP well at all, maybe I should "do a course or sumfink"ROFL, yep that noise reduction filter shrunk the big truck
Have included SOOC shots. Simply resized for JPEG.
Last edited by gbamber; 23-09-2012 at 9:35pm.
gb From GB
C&C is more than welcome, it's encouraged.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Add To Bookmarks
