User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: first play at high ISO with 1DX

  1. #1
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    09 Nov 2009
    Location
    Kalgoorlie
    Posts
    1,153
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    first play at high ISO with 1DX

    ISO 25600

    truck_25600.jpg

    ISO 51200
    smudge_51200.jpg

    It can go higher as well!! I am amazed at how 'useable' these images are. True there was some ambient light and that may make a reasonable difference but imagine the possibilities in a wedding reception type environment. Shot in AV mode at f2.8 with a 70 - 200. ISO on auto.

  2. #2
    Account Closed
    Join Date
    02 May 2012
    Location
    Namoi Valley
    Posts
    849
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That just makes me cry. Any PP at all other than web size reduction?

  3. #3
    Ausphotography Regular
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    09 Nov 2009
    Location
    Kalgoorlie
    Posts
    1,153
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yep - noise reduction in ACR, sharpen in ACR, crop on both images. Slight curves on the cat and sharpen both in CS5.

    No noise reduction set in camera. I have not tried it yet but from what I read the in camera NR is pretty good if you are pumping out JPEG. I shoot only in RAW so I turned it off.

  4. #4
    Ausphotography Veteran MattNQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Dec 2010
    Location
    Townsville
    Posts
    2,264
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by norwest View Post
    That just makes me cry.
    x2
    Last edited by MattNQ; 11-09-2012 at 9:09am.
    Matt
    CC always appreciated

    My Gallery
    Even More Pics


  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Feb 2012
    Location
    Swan Hill
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They look very good at the high ISO, but could be a stupid question, any flash used at at all in the pics?

  6. #6
    Ausphotography irregular Mark L's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Nov 2010
    Location
    magical Mudgee
    Posts
    16,405
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gonk0 View Post
    .... any flash used at at all in the pics?
    sob, ExIf, sob, data, sob, says, sob, no, sob. Crying x 3.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Feb 2012
    Location
    Swan Hill
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark L View Post
    sob, ExIf, sob, data, sob, says, sob, no, sob. Crying x 3.
    Thanks Mark, I got an error when trying to view the EXIF data.

  8. #8
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    28 Oct 2009
    Location
    hobart
    Posts
    626
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    looks like a shite load of noise reduction on 1st shot
    looks cartoony now

  9. #9
    Ausphotography Regular
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    09 Nov 2009
    Location
    Kalgoorlie
    Posts
    1,153
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rowdy23 View Post
    looks like a shite load of noise reduction on 1st shot
    looks cartoony now
    ROFL, yep that noise reduction filter shrunk the big truck

    Have included SOOC shots. Simply resized for JPEG.

    25600

    51200
    Attached Images Attached Images

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    28 Aug 2010
    Location
    Doreen
    Posts
    332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As expected, the 51200 image is pretty horrid, but that's some impressive performance at 25600!

    Please don't hesitate to provide me with CC! I'd love to hear your thoughts regarding any of my images. Thanks!

  11. #11
    Sir Rattus79 - The Proclaimant
    Join Date
    15 Jul 2010
    Location
    Forest Lake
    Posts
    1,948
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eberbachl View Post
    As expected, the 51200 image is pretty horrid, but that's some impressive performance at 25600!

    Nah, that noise is ok, just turn it B&W and call it "artistic"
    Greg Bartle,
    I have a Pentax and I'm not afraid to use it.
    Pentax K5
    Sigma 10-20 | Tamron 17-50 F:2.8 | Sigma 50 F:1.4 | Sigma 70-200 F:2.8 Plus a bunch of Ye Olde lenses


    Would you like to see more?
    http://flickr.com/photosbygreg

  12. #12
    Moderately Underexposed I @ M's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 May 2007
    Location
    Marlo, Far East Gippsland
    Posts
    4,864
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seriously impressive performance Fess. You now have no excuses for any botched low light shots.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eberbachl View Post
    As expected, the 51200 image is pretty horrid, but that's some impressive performance at 25600!

    Horrid ???? I only have to look back 5 or 6 years and remember taking photos like that with a D200 Nikon and thinking that they were a bit rough around the edges and then consoling myself by saying " what do you expect when you push them to 800 ISO".

    Quote Originally Posted by Rattus79 View Post
    Nah, that noise is ok, just turn it B&W and call it "artistic"
    Been there, done that a few times.
    Andrew
    Nikon, Fuji, Nikkor, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina and too many other bits and pieces to list.



  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    28 Aug 2010
    Location
    Doreen
    Posts
    332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm not saying that getting to ISO 51200 before experiencing noise like isn't impressive, just that the noise itself is horrid . The 25600 ISO noise is very usable though, and quite astounding.

    I too remember the low light performance of my first DSLR (Nikon D70), and I'm thankful for what I've got today in my K-5, which is astouding for an APS-C camera.


  14. #14
    Sir Rattus79 - The Proclaimant
    Join Date
    15 Jul 2010
    Location
    Forest Lake
    Posts
    1,948
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    having come from a k10 (ISO 400 useable) to the K5 (ISO 3200 very useable) it's astounding just how far we've come in such a short time.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    19 Aug 2010
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    628
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    nice.
    1DIII, 5DII, 15mm fish, 24mm ts-e, 35L,135L,200L,400L,mpe-65mm
    Film: eos 300, pentax 6x7

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    28 Aug 2008
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    1,913
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rattus79 View Post
    having come from a k10 (ISO 400 useable) to the K5 (ISO 3200 very useable) it's astounding just how far we've come in such a short time.
    haha oh god, I used to dread the K10D at anything above 400!
    Commercial/Editorial/Wedding work - www.jackietranphoto.com
    Travel Photography - www.wanderingasianguy.com

    Broncolor lights up my world.

  17. #17
    Fishy bricat's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Apr 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    747
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Shoot!!!!
    Cheers Brian. Canon 7D Kit lenses EFS 18-55 IS EFS 55-250 IS EF28-90 Canon EF 2xll Extender Sigma DG150-500 OS Speedlight 420EX

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    22 Jul 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    337
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ahhhhhhh........ *drool*

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    21 May 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not a big fan of the NR on the truck image, but yeah it is pretty impressive.
    Cheers, Daniel
    5D III | 35L | 85Σ| 100L | 50/1.8 | 600EX-RT | Di622 II

    facebook

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    26 Jan 2012
    Location
    Rham
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by fess67 View Post
    ROFL, yep that noise reduction filter shrunk the big truck

    Have included SOOC shots. Simply resized for JPEG.
    Yeh, see that's where I go really wrong, I don't do PP well at all, maybe I should "do a course or sumfink"
    Last edited by gbamber; 23-09-2012 at 7:35pm.
    gb From GB
    C&C is more than welcome, it's encouraged.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •