User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  1
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Telephoto lens for KX

  1. #1
    Member leanne0333's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Aug 2012
    Location
    Byron Bay
    Posts
    207
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Telephoto lens for KX

    Hi all, I have a friend who recently received a Pentax kx as a gift but is frustrated trying to find decent lenses for it. She would like something that reaches about 300mm ideally. Any suggestions? I know very little about Pentax! Thank you!

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    18 Sep 2009
    Location
    Invercargill, New Zealand
    Posts
    1,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Something in the 28-300 range might suit. Cost could be a problem.
    Alive and still clicking - apologies to PSQ.
    Living and working in the Roaring Forties
    Assorted cameras of all sizes and shapes including Pentax K (the original), MX, Z1,K20D; 50mm 1.2, 35mm 2.0, 85mm 1.8

  3. #3
    Ausphotography Site Sponsor/Advertiser Film Street's Avatar
    Join Date
    09 Jul 2012
    Location
    Frankston
    Posts
    147
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sigma 70-300 is a well priced option with the added benefit of 1:2 macro.

    There is now a stabilised version that I have not used.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    15 Jul 2010
    Location
    Forest Lake
    Posts
    1,944
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The pentax 55-300 is supposed to be very good, but I have personally not used it.
    For longer lenses for Pentax, the Tamron and Sigmas' become better options.
    I'm told the 18-250's are supposed to be good all rounders.

    Me personally, I have the Sigma 70-200 2.8 and find it very good, but heavy. Maybe a little short, but with a 1.4 tele converter may suit. It kind of really depends upon how heavy and how much $$ your friend want's to spend.
    Greg Bartle,
    I have a Pentax and I'm not afraid to use it.
    Pentax K5
    Sigma 10-20 | Tamron 17-50 F:2.8 | Sigma 50 F:1.4 | Sigma 70-200 F:2.8 Plus a bunch of Ye Olde lenses


    Would you like to see more?
    http://flickr.com/photosbygreg

  5. #5
    Member
    Threadstarter
    leanne0333's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Aug 2012
    Location
    Byron Bay
    Posts
    207
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you all I will pass on your feedback! She says she uses telephoto as her main lens but its not for wildlife or sports so doesn't need more than 300mm and guess as its her main lens probably needs it to be reasonably light!

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    28 Aug 2010
    Location
    Doreen
    Posts
    329
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Pentax SMCP-DA 55-300mm f/4-5.8 ED is supposed to be a fine lens.

    Seems like pretty good value too.

    Please don't hesitate to provide me with CC! I'd love to hear your thoughts regarding any of my images. Thanks!

  7. #7
    It's all about the Light!
    Tech Admin
    Kym's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury, Adelaide
    Posts
    9,632
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    560mm/5.6 FTW
    regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
    Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff



  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    01 Dec 2010
    Location
    salisbury
    Posts
    565
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kym View Post
    560mm/5.6 FTW
    I have the same feeling it is on show at photokina priced at $6999,well that is not the price range for me,so now I can stop saving

    Jack.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •