User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  8
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: 80-400 0r 150-500

  1. #1
    Regular Visitor
    Join Date
    25 Jul 2011
    Location
    Broadwater
    Posts
    3,680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    80-400 0r 150-500

    I am looking at getting a longer lens for birding (have a ef-s 55-250 atm) with a tight budget I am looking at a Tokina AT-X 840 AF D AF 80-400mm f4.5-5.6 Lenses.
    Or should I keep saving for a while and get a Sigma 150-500?
    Does anyone have a 80-400? I have a Canon 450D
    Regards
    Wayne

    CC Always welcome as its a great way of Learning


  2. #2
    Member rene52's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Nov 2009
    Location
    Benalla
    Posts
    1,008
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can not comment on the Tokina lens but can give a little on the Sigma Lens. I have the 50-500 Sigma lens and I don't usually take it off at all. I also have a friend who has the 150-500 Sigma and says it is the better lens (I will stick with my 50-500 for now). Since you mentioned the Tokina I will have to look myself at this one and see if it looks ok or not (more for my motorsports than anything else). I use my Sigma lens for motorsports, landscape, closeup and wildlife on my Canon 7D.

  3. #3
    Regular Visitor
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    25 Jul 2011
    Location
    Broadwater
    Posts
    3,680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks Rene, from the reviews I had read it looks ok but would rather hear someones opinion that has one.

  4. #4
    can't remember Tannin's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Huon Valley
    Posts
    4,122
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Tokina 80-400 is generally regarded as the worst 400mm class lens made today. Tokina make some fantastic lenses. This is not one of them. Avoid.

    The best 400mm class lens is the Canon 100-400. Next best is the Sigma 50-500, next after that is the Sigma 150-500. Oh, and there is an excellent Canon 400mm prime, but that doesn't have IS. You want to have IS. There are various versions of the Sigma lenses I mentioned. The newer versions are apparently better than the older ones.
    Tony

    It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.

  5. #5
    It's all about the Light!
    Tech Admin
    Kym's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury, Adelaide
    Posts
    9,632
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the Sigma 50-500 !! Feral1 and a few others have the 150-500 !! All good!
    regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
    Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff



  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    07 May 2010
    Location
    Bruthen, East Gippsland
    Posts
    4,638
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the 150-500. And although it is a great lens, I have had a few problems with it. Twice now I have lost both AF and OS (IS, VR) First time cost me $400 to repair. So this time I said stuff it, and went a bought a 120-300 Sigma f2.8, with a 2x converter. And have improved my images dramatically. Although it emptied my wallet, and the dog house ended up quite comfortable. I don't think I'll look back.
    Last edited by geoffsta; 22-06-2012 at 10:34pm.
    Geoff
    Honesty is best policy.
    CC is always welcome
    Nikon D3000 ... Nikon D90... Nikon D700 Various lenses, Home studio equipment and all the associated stuff
    Flickr

  7. #7
    Regular Visitor
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    25 Jul 2011
    Location
    Broadwater
    Posts
    3,680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks everyone for you comments, think I will just keep saving until I can afford a 100-400 or the 50-500. I had given getting a 2.8 with a 2x a bit of thought until I saw the price

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    07 May 2010
    Location
    Bruthen, East Gippsland
    Posts
    4,638
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wayne63 View Post
    Thanks everyone for you comments, think I will just keep saving until I can afford a 100-400 or the 50-500. I had given getting a 2.8 with a 2x a bit of thought until I saw the price
    Hence the dog house...

  9. #9
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Join Date
    31 Jul 2010
    Location
    Perth Northern Suburbs
    Posts
    3,724
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wayne, I looked at the 80-400 about a year or so ago, it was very cheaply built, felt poor to zoom and just generally cheap. As Tony (tannin) mentioned, stay away from it, but as also mentioned, Tokina make some wonderful lenses.

    As Kym mentioned, lots on AP have either version of the Sigma Big Guns, also bear in mind the EFOV you'll get when buying a EF or equivilant lens (X mm by 1.6)

    From time to time on (Gumtree or the like) you can pick up the sigma 100-300mm F4, this is a ripper of a lens and falls under the DG mount, so 100 x 1.6 and 300 x 1.6 on your crop body to get EFOV. Here is a link to some helpfull reviews. http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...s-Reviews.aspx Also try this for the discontinued Sigma lenses, (The 100-300) is highlited down the list for you..

    http://www.sigmaphoto.com/discontinued-lens-chart

    P.S. If your looking at a new Sigma Lens, get your best GREY Internet price and speak to your local Sigma Lens supplier here in Oz, and mention the CR Kennedy Price Match. See this link. http://www.crkennedy.com.au/v1/index...price%20match&
    Last edited by Roosta; 27-06-2012 at 6:55pm.
    They call me "Blue" it's a red head thing.
    "My Flickr Site"
    Canon Bodies - 1DMk2N + 50D - Lenses - 17-35mm F2.8 L - 24-70mm F2.8 L - 70-200mm F2.8 L - 300mm F4 IS L - Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 - Sigma 10-20mm - DJI Mavic Pro Platinum
    " I Never get tired of looking at our diverse country, even if its through the lens of someone else".
    CC is always appreciated.


  10. #10
    Arch-Σigmoid Ausphotography Regular ameerat42's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Sep 2009
    Location
    Nthn Sydney
    Posts
    23,517
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm the last to give advice on birding lenses, but I'd ask, what is your usual distance - close, or far?

    From my P(ret)TY LTD experience, I have wanted to get longer focal lengths for this most of the time.
    Am.
    CC, Image editing OK.

  11. #11
    Regular Visitor
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    25 Jul 2011
    Location
    Broadwater
    Posts
    3,680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you Roosta & ameerat for your replies, I will be keeping an eye out for the lens you have mentioned. thanks

  12. #12
    Regular Visitor
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    25 Jul 2011
    Location
    Broadwater
    Posts
    3,680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just a bit of an update, Iam now thinking about a Sigma 120-400. Does anyone have the lens? and how does it perfom? I think that most of my work would be covered by the 400mm max and also still has f5.6 @400. The reason I am looking at this one is as I could buy it new rather than a used lens with a f2.8

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    08 Oct 2010
    Location
    Greenwich
    Posts
    1,704
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You can also look for a good used Canon 100-400L.
    There are a few around at very reasonable prices and it is a stellar lens, for what it is.
    All my photos are taken with recycled pixels.
    Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit.
    Wisdom, is knowing not to serve it in a fruit salad.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •