User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: lens for D7000

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    27 Nov 2011
    Location
    northen beaches
    Posts
    1,482
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    lens for D7000

    Hi i have a Tokina 11-16 for my D7000 which is great but look for something a little longer to fell the gap to i get a 70-200vr ,i mainly do landscape any suggestions.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    19 Nov 2007
    Location
    Sydney (Nth. Beaches)
    Posts
    1,190
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At the expensive end of the market look at the Nikon 24-70mm f2.8, its a superb lens.
    At the "Bang for bucks" end of the market look at the Tamron 17-50 f2.8 (non Vibration Control model) its a very good sharp lens.
    Cheers
    Darey

    Nikon user, Thick skinned and wanting to improve, genuine C & C welcomed.

    Photographs don't lie ! - Anonymous Liar

  3. #3
    dieselpower
    Guest
    The Nikon 17-55 f2.8 at the expensive end too. An absolutely cracking lens for dx bodies!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    27 Nov 2008
    Location
    Wunghnu Victoria
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Tamron 28-75 2.8 is a real gem on DX bodies. Quite useable wide open and cheap. I bought a demo model from the US about 2 years ago, best $300 I've spent on photographic gear no question.

    Cheers
    Leigh

  5. #5
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    27 Nov 2011
    Location
    northen beaches
    Posts
    1,482
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you for your response, at the high end the 17-55 sounds like the go, ill have a look at the others thanks.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    15 Jul 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    457
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    17-55mm f2.8 get it secondhand if you want it cheaper, they are built well, otherwise the 17-50 tamron, but it is definitely not built as well.
    Some Nikon stuff... gerrys photo journey
    https://plus.google.com/+GerardBlacklock
    No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    07 Apr 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    316
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Depends a bit on whether you plan to stick with a crop sensor. If there is a future upgrade to full frame contemplated, you may wish to keep options open by tending towards to 24 - 70mm or similar.

    I just picked up a Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 (which is superb but expensive). In my searches, second hand examples were still relatively expensive.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Id actually recommend the 24-120
    Darren
    Gear : Nikon Goodness
    Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
    Please support Precious Hearts
    Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    06 Feb 2012
    Location
    St Clair
    Posts
    233
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TEITZY View Post
    The Tamron 28-75 2.8 is a real gem on DX bodies. Quite useable wide open and cheap. I bought a demo model from the US about 2 years ago, best $300 I've spent on photographic gear no question.

    Cheers
    Leigh
    I'll second that, great lens for the price & quite versatile for the focal length.
    Last edited by simonrl; 04-04-2012 at 9:55pm.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •