User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  13
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Which tripod head?

  1. #21
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    8,777
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One thing I've noticed with heads, is that it's not so much about whether will you ever need ot come close tot he rated capacity of the head, but that with the higher rated capacity heads, you get an infinitely more rigid coupling to the tripod.

    If it comes down to a matter of price, always go for the most expensive model that you can afford.

    Haven't checked the price differences between a Q3 and a Q10, but if it's only $100, then in the future and especially having a 70-200/2.8 already then the better candidate would be a Q10 with the higher weight rating!
    The size of the ball itself if quite critical in how rigid the set up is going to be(when you need it most!)

    (OK, so I got curious! )
    The pricing of Markins' products seems to be similar to RRS, and having just checked, I'd say definitely go with the larger ballhead for only $60 more!!

    Markins seem to be of the traditional style design, more upright and taller than some of the variants in ballhead design.

    For that kind of money, you should also look at the RRS product range too. It's a lower sleeker design(which I prefer now).

    It all depends on your most favoured photography genre too. If you do landscapes and some faster action stuff, like birds/sports/etc where shutter speeds are usually high, then any head will suffice.

    If you think you will ever get into a photography genre where mirror slap will cause IQ issues, or you need to hang the camera out a long way out from the COG of the tripod and the slightest trace of vibration is then magnified many times over, then you will ultimately want a larger ballhead(as large as you can afford).
    Nikon D800E, D300, D70s
    {Nikon}; -> 50/1.2 : 500/8 : 105/2.8VR Micro : 180/2.8 ais : 105mm f/1.8 ais : 24mm/2 ais
    {Sigma}; ->10-20/4-5.6 : 50/1.4 : 12-24/4.5-5.6II : 150-600mm|S
    {Tamron}; -> 17-50/2.8 : 28-75/2.8 : 70-200/2.8 : 300/2.8 SP MF : 24-70/2.8VC

    {Yongnuo}; -> YN35/2N : YN50/1.8N


  2. #22
    Member KeeFy's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Mar 2011
    Location
    Newtown
    Posts
    469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have to agree with arthur on that. Unless you have the need to go light, go for the bigger ballhead for a mini hit in the cash department.

  3. #23
    All lines lead to Home ...
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    12 Apr 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    902
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just a quick question regarding L brackets. These are used so you can mount your camera body vertically to allow you to shoot vertical pictures. My question is: If I use a L bracket, does the same bracket allow me to mount the body of the camera the traditional way (landscape)?
    Regards,
    Phil

  4. #24
    Member rodw's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Sep 2010
    Location
    Brisbane QLD
    Posts
    188
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by arnica View Post
    Just a quick question regarding L brackets. These are used so you can mount your camera body vertically to allow you to shoot vertical pictures. My question is: If I use a L bracket, does the same bracket allow me to mount the body of the camera the traditional way (landscape)?
    Yes, see here http://www.nikonians.org/html/resour...wiss_b1_6.html
    RodW
    Brisbane south side

  5. #25
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    27 May 2009
    Location
    Woy Woy - Central Coast
    Posts
    914
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, the brackets allows quick switching between vertical (portrait) and horizontal (landscape) orientation. I leave mine on my camera all the time.
    David

    Nikon D810
    Nikkor AF-S 24-120VR, Nikkor AF-S 16-35VR, Nikkor AF-S 70-300VR, Nikkor AF 50 f1.8
    Tamron 90mm Macro

  6. #26
    All lines lead to Home ...
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    12 Apr 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    902
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My purchases arrived today.

    I ended up getting:

    Markins L plate
    Markins Q10Q head.

    Much lighter than my manfrotto gear, and yes .. it looks so pretty ... it's like polished glass!

  7. #27
    Still in the Circle of Confusion Cage's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 May 2010
    Location
    Hunter Valley
    Posts
    5,580
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Congrats on getting your new kit Phil. Wish I could have got a dedicated 'L' plate for my camera but had to settle for a non-twist camera plate.
    It's not really too much of a hassle as the Q10 is pretty easy to drop into portrait mode.

    Enjoy your new gear mate.

    Cheers

    Kevin
    Cheers
    Kev

    Nikon D810: D600 (Astro Modded): D7200 and 'stuff', lots of 'stuff'

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •