User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 38 of 38

Thread: Neutral Density Filter

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    25 Feb 2008
    Location
    **Suburb/Town Required**
    Posts
    141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks everyone

    I ordered a cokin kit for the Nikon DSLR today (found a kit on the cokin website that comes with holder, adapter and a filter) and will get the ND4 with it when I pick it up.

    I worked out to be much cheaper to use this system then to go with the screw in type from say Hoya, especially if I get a lens of a different diameter down the track. Two ND screw ins came to the same price as two P series filters and the holder kit (roughly anyway).

    I'll look at the graduated soon, once I get this going and sorted out.

    Mick

  2. #22
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    29 Oct 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm still in the middle of decision which one to get whether to get a set of Cokin filters or get from a good quality brand like Singh-Ray/Lee but only selective types.

    Which ND or GND filter that is used the most? I've read in some forums, some said ND4 (0.6) but some said ND8 (0.9). Some said ND2 is quite useless. Is ND 8 mainly used in the extreme brightness like at the snowy area? If so, it wouldn't be applicable for me since I haven't been to snowy area and not seeing any frequent travel to that area either

    Thanks for the help

  3. #23
    Account Closed reaction's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    788
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hm. what's a good price for ND filters?

    ND2 feels useless to me, I mean unless to stack onto a set of 2,4,8
    How does it add if you do that tho?

    What brands are known 'good' and 'bad'?
    Someone said they didn't like Hoya for some reason.

  4. #24
    Member Bunyip's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Jan 2009
    Location
    Inner West of Sydney
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by znelbok View Post
    After yesterdays day out to get some practise, the waterfall was too bright for a good exposure...
    Yeah, I've been dying to try shooting those beach scenes where the wash of the water over the rocks creates a misty look.

    The real pain of the ND filter thing is when you have lenses of different filter widths, and you don't know for certain which lens you'll want to use the filter with.

  5. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    10 Oct 2006
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    34
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bunyip View Post
    Yeah, I've been dying to try shooting those beach scenes where the wash of the water over the rocks creates a misty look.

    The real pain of the ND filter thing is when you have lenses of different filter widths, and you don't know for certain which lens you'll want to use the filter with.
    you can get different ring adapters for the various lenses you have. they aren't very expensive and unless you're using it on a wide angle lens, you shouldn't have any issues with the filters.

  6. #26
    Administrator ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bunyip View Post
    Yeah, I've been dying to try shooting those beach scenes where the wash of the water over the rocks creates a misty look.

    The real pain of the ND filter thing is when you have lenses of different filter widths, and you don't know for certain which lens you'll want to use the filter with.
    The wash over rocks shots are often done late in the evening, well after sunset. Doing them at 10.30 pm or later, you dont need ND's.
    "It is one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it is another thing to make a portrait of who they are" - Paul Caponigro

    Constructive Critique of my photographs is always appreciated
    Nikon, etc!

    RICK
    My Photography

  7. #27
    Administrator ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    The Cokin P system is a good starter kit. Be aware that if you like wide-angle shots, then at 10..11..12 mm the filter holder is visible in your shot (vignettes). The Cokin Z-Pro system is a bigger system and works well, but the filters are more expensive. The Cokin Z-Pro system is also a standard 100mm filter system, so the better quality filters, like LEE, will work with it.

    Cokin filters have a known issue where if you stack them, under certain light conditions, a magenta tone is visible in your photos. Correctable in PP, but it is there. I have seen it only a few times now with my Cokin Z-Pro system, and when it happens it is a very pronounced magenta toning.

  8. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    26 Nov 2008
    Location
    Booval, Qld (near Ipswich)
    Posts
    2,018
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here is an example of what happens, it's a friends image on flickr, asked me to link to it instead of using the image in the post (fair enough too).

  9. #29
    Administrator ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Allann View Post
    Here is an example of what happens, it's a friends image on flickr, asked me to link to it instead of using the image in the post (fair enough too).
    Good move, cause posting someone elses photo direct to AP brings copyright issues into play. Members should only ever post their own work.

  10. #30
    Account Closed reaction's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    788
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Are no brand really bad then? I'd imagine a severe cast.

    HMC Hoyas go for abt 40-60 each, I'd only use on my 16-85.
    Duno whether to go for 'thin' ones, which cost 1.5-2x but may be better for stacking.

  11. #31
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    29 Nov 2008
    Location
    River Murray
    Posts
    728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For ND filters, I would recommend B+W. They are the best on the market and should last a lifetime. Having said that, the Singh Ray variable ND filter looks appealing, even if the price isn't.

    For GND, I would recommend that you start with Cokin but be aware that these are not a long term purchase of the calibre of the B+W. They will scratch, no matter how well you look after them. These scratches may not effect image quality but over time, new filters will likely be required. But the Cokin is certainly a good starting point and will allow you to evaluate what type you use more often. You may then wish to graduate ot the Singh Ray. The holders are cheap, however you will most likely end up just holding them in front of the lens, or using blue-tac to hold them.

  12. #32
    Administrator ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    iI have found that the Cokin Z-Pro filters are much less prone to scratches than the P system ones. My Z-Pro ones are in great condition, my old P system ones I replaced a few due to scratches.

  13. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Jan 2009
    Location
    Goolwa, South Australia.
    Posts
    69
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the Cokin (P) GND, a B&W 502 GND, Hoya ND4 (2 stops), ND8 (3 stops) & ND400 (9 stops)
    The Cokin P121 (They call it: "Gradual Neutral Grey G2 ND8") is not neutral. It has a magenta'ish colour caste.
    A few examples of the colour cast:
    Cokin P121 & Hoya ND400
    Cokin P121, Cokin c-pol & Hoya ND8
    Some examples of the ND400 here.

    The ND4 (by itself) I find pretty useless. I often stack it with the ND8 to do stuff like this.
    There are some others here

    The ND8 by itself is OK, but since getting the ND400 I don't use the others much.

    The B & W GND is a beautiful piece of glass and German engineering, but I never use it. It has too little effect, as the tint, whilst beginning in the centre of the glass is too gradual for any great effect.
    web image of the B&W GND

    All my screw on filters are in 77mm and I use step up rings for use on my other (non 77mm) lenses.

    Hope that's of some help.

    Regards,
    Michael
    _________________________________________
    Nikon D810, Nikon D200, Fuji S5Pro + stuff
    Nikon F80, Pentax MG, Samoca M35, Kodak Retinette 1A.
    Flickr

  14. #34
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    29 Nov 2008
    Location
    River Murray
    Posts
    728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ricktas View Post
    iI have found that the Cokin Z-Pro filters are much less prone to scratches than the P system ones. My Z-Pro ones are in great condition, my old P system ones I replaced a few due to scratches.
    Interesting, I will have to get some of these.

  15. #35
    Account Closed reaction's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    788
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hehe, B+W surely have great reviews, but for the $$$
    not that pro!

    why is ND400 9 stops? 2^9 should be 512

  16. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    03 Jan 2009
    Location
    Goolwa, South Australia.
    Posts
    69
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by reaction View Post
    hehe, B+W surely have great reviews, but for the $$$
    not that pro!


    why is ND400 9 stops? 2^9 should be 512
    That's a pretty good question.
    My guess is that it's not exactly 9 stops - but close enough to it.
    (maybe they rounded 8.64385619 up to 9? )

    To add to what I wrote before;The ND400 is a bit of a special tool.
    Use on a wide angle lens will result in a lot of vignetting, as light from anywhere but the centre of the image is passing through the filter glass at an angle and will therefore suffer higher attenuation. Sometimes this looks ok, sometimes not.

    The OP asked which she should get, ND or GND.
    In my opinion it depends what you want to shoot as they are suited to different purposes.
    If you're wanting to shoot waterfalls in even light, river/wave motion or to allow a slower shutter speed for (action) motion blur (on a bright day) - get ND's.
    If you're wanting to shoot land/seascapes where you know the sky will blow out or to emphasise the sky/clouds - a GND may be more useful.

    Regards,
    Michael

  17. #37
    Account Closed reaction's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    788
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I guess the other side of the Q is,
    if I get ONLY ND8, are there any scenes where I would have wanted ND2/4 but can't use ND8 with?
    I can't think of any, but who knows?

  18. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    15 Dec 2007
    Location
    Mountain River, Tasmania
    Posts
    125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have lost count the amount of times I have answered thsi question so I won't go into huge detail.

    Buy a Cokin system, work out if you use them often (as I did), then throw them out or give to some other sucker and buy Lee or Singh-Ray rectangular filters (maybe buy the Cokin Z-pro system to hold Lee - Lee holders (and filters) are VERY expensive).

    Chalk and cheese, you get what you pay for. Don't bother buying an expensive system though unless you use them all the time as I do.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •